Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059065›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Rapid control and feedback rates enhance neuroprosthetic control.

Maryam M Shanechi, Amy L Orsborn, Helene G Moorman, Suraj Gowda, Siddharth Dangi, Jose M Carmena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modeling and dissociation of intrinsic and input-driven neural population dynamics underlying behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam M ShanechiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Amy L OrsbornUC Berkeley - UCSF Joint Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Helene G MoormanHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Suraj GowdaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Siddharth DangiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Jose M CarmenaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) create novel sensorimotor pathways for action. Much as the sensorimotor apparatus shapes natural motor control, the BMI pathway characteristics may also influence neuroprosthetic control. Here, we explore the influence of control and feedback rates, where control rate indicates how often motor commands are sent from the brain to the prosthetic, and feedback rate indicates how often visual feedback of the prosthetic is provided to the subject. We developed a new BMI that allows arbitrarily fast control and feedback rates, and used it to dissociate the effects of each rate in two monkeys. Increasing the control rate significantly improved control even when feedback rate was unchanged. Increasing the feedback rate further facilitated control. We also show that our high-rate BMI significantly outperformed state-of-the-art methods due to higher control and feedback rates, combined with a different point process mathematical encoding model. Our BMI paradigm can dissect the contribution of different elements in the sensorimotor pathway, providing a unique tool for studying neuroprosthetic control mechanisms.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesFeedbackAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansMacaca mulattaMaleTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28059065
PMCPMC5227098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.