ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017
Impact of gender and dialysis adequacy on anaemia in peritoneal dialysis.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in peritoneal dialysis duration and management among Japanese patients: a nationwide registry analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Erythropoietin resistance among pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Hemoglobin Concentration on Renal Outcomes with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Multifaceted Sexual Dysfunction in Dialyzing Men and Women: Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Normalized Protein Catabolic Rate Is a Superior Nutritional Marker Associated With Dialysis Adequacy in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the general population, haemoglobin (Hb) concentration is higher in men than in women. However, target Hb levels in dialysis patients are set constant regardless of the patient's sex. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hb concentration and the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients taking gender and dialysis adequacy into account.
methodsThe study comprised two parts. The first was a cross-sectional analysis of Hb and ESA in 2180 prevalent PD patients. The second included 88 incident PD patients, followed for 36 months. During this time, the major parameters recorded at 12-month intervals included: Hb concentration, weekly ESA, total, renal, and peritoneal Kt/V. Erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) was calculated as the ratio between ESA dose and achieved Hb.
resultsIn prevalent PD patients, Hb concentration was significantly lower in women, (11.2 ± 1.4 vs. 11.5 ± 1.6 g/dl; p < 0.001), despite higher doses of ESA (2691 ± 1821 vs. 2344 ± 1422; p = 0.001). Hb concentrations were related to dialysis adequacy in both cohorts. However, despite significantly higher Kt/V, women were characterized by a lower Hb level. In incident patients, this association was present throughout the observation period, while the ESA dose in women was significantly higher at every time point. In multiple regression analysis, gender was an independent determinant of ERI (b = 0.34; p < 0.05).
conclusionsDespite higher dialysis adequacy, Hb concentration in women treated with PD is significantly lower, and the ability to correct it impaired, as compared to men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.