Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28058637›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017

Efficient screening of potential cellulases and hemicellulases produced by Bosea sp. FBZP-16 using the combination of enzyme assays and genome analysis.

Aicha Asma Houfani, Tomáš Větrovský, Petr Baldrian, Said Benallaoua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SupplementalJournal of immunology research · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Characterization and Probiotic Potency ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aicha Asma HoufaniLaboratoire de Microbiologie Appliquée (LMA), Département de Microbiologie, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université de Bejaia, 06000, Bejaia, Algeria.
Tomáš VětrovskýLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS), Videnska 1083, 14220, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Petr BaldrianLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS), Videnska 1083, 14220, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Said BenallaouaLaboratoire de Microbiologie Appliquée (LMA), Département de Microbiologie, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université de Bejaia, 06000, Bejaia, Algeria. sbenal@hotmail.com.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZUniversity of Béjaïa · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of bacteria that produce carbohydrolytic enzymes is extremely important given the increased demand for these enzymes in many industries. Twenty lignocellulose-degrading bacterial isolates from Algerian compost and different soils were screened for their potential to produce different enzymes involved in biomass deconstruction. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the isolates belonged to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Differences among species were reflected both as the presence/absence of enzymes or at the level of enzyme activity. Among the most active species, Bosea sp. FBZP-16 demonstrated cellulolytic activity on both amorphous cellulose (CMC) and complex lignocellulose (wheat straw) and was selected for whole-genomic sequencing. The genome sequencing revealed the presence of a complex enzymatic machinery required for organic matter decomposition. Analysis of the enzyme-encoding genes indicated that multiple genes for endoglucanase, xylanase, β-glucosidase and β-mannosidase are present in the genome with enzyme activities displayed by the bacterium, while other enzymes, such as certain cellobiohydrolases, were not detected at the genomic level. This indicates that a combination of functional screening of bacterial cultures with the use of genome-derived information is important for the prediction of potential enzyme production. These results provide insight into their possible exploitation for the production of fuels and chemicals derived from plant biomass.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaBacterial ProteinsCellulaseCelluloseGlycoside HydrolasesLigninPhylogenyProteobacteriaRhizobiaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNASoilSoil MicrobiologyBacterial ProteinsCellulaseCelluloseGlycoside HydrolaseshemicellulaseLigninlignocelluloseRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilBoseaCellulasesEnzyme assaysGenome sequencingHemicellulases

Identifiers

PMID28058637
OpenAlexW2570824190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.