Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28058538›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2017

Factors influencing the choice of first- and second-line biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from the Italian LORHEN Registry.

Sara Monti, Catherine Klersy, Roberto Gorla, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Fabiola Atzeni, Raffaele Pellerito, Enrico Fusaro, Giuseppe Paolazzi, Pier Andrea Rocchetta, Ennio Giulio Favalli and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Single-centre experience of refractory rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sara MontiDepartment of Rheumatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. sara.saramonti@gmail.com.
Catherine KlersyBiometry and Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Roberto GorlaReumatologia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Piercarlo Sarzi-PuttiniUniversity Hospital L Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Fabiola AtzeniUniversity Hospital L Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Raffaele PelleritoOspedale Mauriziano, Turin, Italy.
Enrico FusaroAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe PaolazziSanta Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Pier Andrea RocchettaStruttura di Reumatologia A.S.O. "SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo", Alessandria, Italy.
Ennio Giulio FavalliDepartment of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy.
Antonio MarchesoniDepartment of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy.
Roberto CaporaliDepartment of Rheumatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to international recommendations, the selection of the biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is mainly left to the clinician's preference. We analyzed the real-life factors influencing the first-line choice or the switching strategy, focusing on the prescription of abatacept (ABA) or tocilizumab (TCZ) compared to TNFα inhibitors (TNFi). Patients enrolled in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) Registry after January 1, 2010, when all considered bDMARD agents were available, were included. The population was divided into "first-" and "second-line" bDMARD. We included 1910 patients (first line n = 1264, second line n = 646). Age was higher in ABA or TCZ vs TNFi treated patients (p < 0.0001). Positive latent tuberculosis screening was associated with first-line ABA (p = 0.002). Methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy was lower in the TCZ group (p = 0.02). The type (dyslipidemia, hypertension, pulmonary disease) and the number of comorbidities influenced the choice towards ABA (p = 0.01). Multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that a second-line treatment, higher age, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, other comorbidities, and extra-articular RA manifestations were associated with ABA compared to TNFi. TCZ was associated with a second-line treatment, higher age, and more severe disease activity. Stopping the first bDMARD due to adverse events (AE) influenced the choice towards ABA. In real life, higher age and comorbidities influence the choice towards ABA and TCZ compared to TNFi. ABA was preferred in case of suspension of previous treatments due to AE. After failing a first-line TNFi, swapping to a different mechanism of action is more common.

Indexed as

AbataceptAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological TherapyComorbidityDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansItalyLogistic ModelsMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRegistriesAbataceptAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexatetocilizumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAbataceptBiologic therapyRheumatoid arthritisTNF inhibitorsTocilizumabTreatment choice

Identifiers

PMID28058538
OpenAlexW2569391978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.