Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28058499›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2017

[Rheumatoid arthritis].

D Aletaha, A Kerschbaumer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D AletahaKlinische Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. daniel.aletaha@meduniwien.ac.at.
A KerschbaumerKlinische Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapy reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is still a challenge for physicians as well as for patients. Effective therapy with subsequent achievement of low disease activity or even remission is achievable for numerous patients using currently available treatment options. Therapy discontinuation has therefore become a hot topic and the risk of exacerbation of well-controlled RA must be weighed against the medical and economic benefits of reducing or even discontinuing therapy. This article gives a review of data regarding tapering of therapy in RA, focusing on conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy, reduction of conventional therapy under continuing therapy with biologics and discontinuation of biologics. Important influencing factors for a safe and successful tapering procedure appear to be disease activity, disease duration and the tapering process itself (i.e. gradual dose reduction vs. abrupt discontinuation). Additionally, the so-called nocebo effect should also be taken into consideration for interpretation of drug tapering studies.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsDiscontinuationDosageNocebo effectReductionTherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.