ArticlePediatric cardiology2017
Electrocardiographic RR and QT Interval Variability in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect and Healthy Children.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atrial Septal Defect and Heart Rhythm Disorders: Physiopathological Linkage and Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Evaluation of perinatal autonomic development in infants using the QT/RR variability ratio.Fujita medical journal · 2020Article
- Maturation of the QT Variability Index is Impaired in Preterm Infants.Pediatric cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial septal defect is a common congenital heart disease. In patients with atrial septal defect, left-to-right shunting increases the right atrial and right ventricular preload. This pathological change affects sinus node automaticity and myocardial depolarization and repolarization, and has the potential to evoke arrhythmogenic substrates. We examined the effect of atrial septal defect on sinus node automaticity and myocardial repolarization by investigating the variability in the repolarization interval, namely the QT variability index (QTVI) and variability ratio (VR). This retrospective study included 38 patients (mean age, 2.2 ± 1.9 years; mean left-to-right shunt ratio, 2.1 ± 0.70) and 40 age-matched healthy control subjects evaluated from 2008 to 2015. QTVI was calculated using the ratio of the repolarization parameter variance to heart rate variance, and VR was calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation (SD) of QT intervals to the SD of RR intervals on electrocardiography. There was a significant difference in the SD of all normal RR intervals, heart rate variance, VR, and QTVI of control subjects or patients with low shunt ratio compared with patients with high shunt ratio (all P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed strong positive correlations between the left-to-right shunt ratio and VR (r = 0.662, P < 0.0001) or QTVI (r = 0.808, P < 0.0001). These repolarization indices provide information on alteration of sinus node autonomic control and the pathophysiology of myocardial repolarization, and could be used as a noninvasive indicator of the shunt ratio in children with atrial septal defect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28058479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.