Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28058024›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Short-term effectiveness of golimumab for ulcerative colitis: Observational multicenter study.

Marta Maia Bosca-Watts, Xavier Cortes, Marisa Iborra, Jose Maria Huguet, Laura Sempere, Gloria Garcia, Rafa Gil, MariFe Garcia, Marga Muñoz, Pedro Almela and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Golimumab (anti-TNF monoclonal antibody): where we stand today.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Golimumab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marta Maia Bosca-WattsMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Xavier CortesMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Marisa IborraMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Jose Maria HuguetMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Laura SempereMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Gloria GarciaMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Rafa GilMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
MariFe GarciaMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Marga MuñozMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Pedro AlmelaMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Nuria MarotoMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Jose Maria ParedesMarta Maia Bosca-Watts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Digestive Disease Department, University of Valencia, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the real-world effectiveness of golimumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) and to identify predictors of response.

methodsWe conducted an observational, prospective and multi-center study in UC patients treated with golimumab, from September 2014 to September 2015. Clinical activity was assessed at week 0 and 14 with the physician's global clinical assessment (PGA) and the partial Mayo score. Colonoscopies and blood tests were performed, following daily-practice clinical criteria, and the results were recorded in an SPSS database.

resultsThirty-three consecutive patients with moderately to severely active UC were included. Among them, 54.5% were female and 42 years was the average age. Thirty percent had left-sided UC (E2) and 70% had extensive UC (E3). All patients had an endoscopic Mayo score of 2 or 3 at baseline. Twenty-seven point three percent were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment naïve, whereas 72.7% had previously received infliximab and/or adalimumab. Sixty-nine point seven percent showed clinical response and were steroid-free at week 14 (a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score of at least 3 points). Based on PGA, the clinical remission and clinical response rates were 24% and 55% respectively. Withdrawal of corticosteroids was observed in 70.8% of steroid-dependent patients at the end of the study. Three out of 10 clinical non-responders needed a colectomy. Mean fecal calprotectin value at baseline was 300 μg/g, and 170.5 μg/g at week 14. Being anti-TNF treatment naïve was a protection factor, which was related to better chances of reaching clinical remission. Twenty-seven point three percent of the patients required treatment intensification at 14 wk of follow-up. Only three adverse effects (AEs) were observed during the study; all were mild and golimumab was not interrupted.

conclusionThis real-life practice study endorses golimumab's promising results, demonstrating its short-term effectiveness and confirming it as a safe drug during the induction phase.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsColitis, UlcerativeColonoscopyDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexSpainAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsgolimumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaGolimumabReal-life resultsUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID28058024
PMCPMC5175256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.