Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28057928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Predictive screening of M1 and M2 macrophages reveals the immunomodulatory effectiveness of post spinal cord injury azithromycin treatment.

John C Gensel, Timothy J Kopper, Bei Zhang, Michael B Orr, William M Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John C GenselSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40536.
Timothy J KopperSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40536.
Bei ZhangSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40536.
Michael B OrrSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40536.
William M BaileySpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40536.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

UK Spinal Cord &Brain Injury Research Center Core GrantP30NS051220 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HALL, EDWARD D. · 2005 to 2015
$6.4M
The role of macrophage phenotype and age in spinal cord injuryR01NS091582 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GENSEL, JOHN C · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS051220NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers a heterogeneous macrophage response that when experimentally polarized toward alternative forms of activation (M2 macrophages) promotes tissue and functional recovery. There are limited pharmacological therapies that can drive this reparative inflammatory state. In the current study, we used in vitro systems to comprehensively defined markers of macrophages with known pathological (M1) and reparative (M2) properties in SCI. We then used these markers to objectively define the macrophage activation states after SCI in response to delayed azithromycin treatment. Mice were subjected to moderate-severe thoracic contusion SCI. Azithromycin or vehicle was administered beginning 30 minutes post-SCI and then daily for 3 or 7 days post injury (dpi). We detected a dose-dependent polarization toward purportedly protective M2 macrophages with daily AZM treatment. Specifically, AZM doses of 10, 40, or 160 mg/kg decreased M1 macrophage gene expression at 3 dpi while the lowest (10 mg/kg) and highest (160 mg/kg) doses increased M2 macrophage gene expression at 7 dpi. Azithromycin has documented immunomodulatory properties and is commonly prescribed to treat infections in SCI individuals. This work demonstrates the utility of objective, comprehensive macrophage gene profiling for evaluating immunomodulatory SCI therapies and highlights azithromycin as a promising agent for SCI treatment.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinGene ExpressionMacrophagesMice, Inbred C57BLSpinal Cord InjuriesUp-RegulationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID28057928
PMCPMC5216345
OpenAlexW2568982082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.