Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28057607›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2017

The Value of Electronic Medical Record Implementation in Mental Health Care: A Case Study.

Sanaz Riahi, Ilan Fischler, Melanie I Stuckey, Philip E Klassen, John Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Delivering person-centered care with an electronic health record.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Designing a reference architecture for health information systems.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Article
  7. The Promise and Pitfalls of Electronic Health Records and Person-Centered Care Planning.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanaz RiahiOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-9038
Ilan FischlerOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-9681
Melanie I StuckeyOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3478-1469
Philip E KlassenOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-2763
John ChenOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0453-3085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic medical records (EMR) have been implemented in many organizations to improve the quality of care. Evidence supporting the value added to a recovery-oriented mental health facility is lacking.

objectiveThe goal of this project was to implement and customize a fully integrated EMR system in a specialized, recovery-oriented mental health care facility. This evaluation examined the outcomes of quality improvement initiatives driven by the EMR to determine the value that the EMR brought to the organization.

methodsThe setting was a tertiary-level mental health facility in Ontario, Canada. Clinical informatics and decision support worked closely with point-of-care staff to develop workflows and documentation tools in the EMR. The primary initiatives were implementation of modules for closed loop medication administration, collaborative plan of care, clinical practice guidelines for schizophrenia, restraint minimization, the infection prevention and control surveillance status board, drug of abuse screening, and business intelligence.

resultsMedication and patient scan rates have been greater than 95% since April 2014, mitigating the adverse effects of medication errors. Specifically, between April 2014 and March 2015, only 1 moderately severe and 0 severe adverse drug events occurred. The number of restraint incidents decreased 19.7%, which resulted in cost savings of more than Can $1.4 million (US $1.0 million) over 2 years. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for schizophrenia increased adherence to evidence-based practices, standardizing care across the facility. Improved infection prevention and control surveillance reduced the number of outbreak days from 47 in the year preceding implementation of the status board to 7 days in the year following. Decision support to encourage preferential use of the cost-effective drug of abuse screen when clinically indicated resulted in organizational cost savings.

conclusionsEMR implementation allowed Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences to use data analytics to identify and select appropriate quality improvement initiatives, supporting patient-centered, recovery-oriented practices and providing value at the clinical, organizational, and societal levels.

Indexed as

electronic health recordshealth information managementmedical informaticsmental healthorganizational innovationpsychiatryquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID28057607
PMCPMC5247622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.