ArticleVision research2017
Monocular and binocular smooth pursuit in central field loss.
Article in Vision research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring eye-hand coordination in central field loss with virtual reality.Research square · 2026Article
- Eye tracking for the classification of visual function in individuals with vision impairment: A validation in Para athletes.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Oculomotor challenges in macular degeneration impact motion extrapolation.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- How People With Vision Impairment Use Their Gaze to Hit a Ball.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Effects of binocularity and eye dominance on visually-driven ocular tracking.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cancellation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during smooth pursuit in patients with maculopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- Mapping residual stereopsis in macular degeneration.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Saccadic contributions to smooth pursuit in macular degeneration.Vision research · 2022Article
- Altered eye movements during reading under degraded viewing conditions: Background luminance, text blur, and text contrast.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- Eye, head, and gaze contributions to smooth pursuit in macular degeneration.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Motion perception in central field loss.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Image Stabilization in Central Vision Loss: The Horizontal Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.Journal of vision · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Macular degeneration results in heterogeneous central field loss (CFL) and often has asymmetrical effects in the two eyes. As such, it is not clear to what degree the movements of the two eyes are coordinated. To address this issue, we examined smooth pursuit quantitatively in CFL participants during binocular viewing and compared it to the monocular viewing case. We also examined coordination of the two eyes during smooth pursuit and how this coordination was affected by interocular ratios of acuity and contrast, as well as CFL-specific interocular differences, such as scotoma sizes and degree of binocular overlap. We hypothesized that the coordination of eye movements would depend on the binocularity of the two eyes. To test our hypotheses, we used a modified step-ramp paradigm, and measured pursuit in both eyes while viewing was binocular, or monocular with the dominant or non-dominant eye. Data for CFL participants and age-matched controls were examined at the group, within-group, and individual levels. We found that CFL participants had a broader range of smooth pursuit gains and a significantly lower correlation between the two eyes, as compared to controls. Across both CFL and control groups, smooth pursuit gain and correlation between the eyes are best predicted by the ratio of contrast sensitivity between the eyes. For the subgroup of participants with measurable stereopsis, both smooth pursuit gain and correlation are best predicted by stereoacuity. Therefore, our results suggest that coordination between the eyes during smooth pursuit depends on binocular cooperation between the eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.