Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28057045›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2017

Validation of a new method for the endoscopic measurement of post-bariatric gastric outlet using a standard guidewire: an observer agreement study.

Luiz Gustavo de Quadros, Manoel Dos Passos Galvão Neto, Josemberg Marins Campos, Roberto Luiz Kaiser Junior, Eduardo Grecco, Mario Flamini Junior, Marcelo Falcao de Santana, Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho, Adriano Augusto Tomas Vasconcelos Almeida Alexandre

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luiz Gustavo de QuadrosDepartment of Endoscopy and Bariatric Surgery, Kaiser Clinic and Day Hospital, São José do Rio Preto, SP, 15015-110, Brazil. gustavo_quadros@hotmail.com.
Manoel Dos Passos Galvão NetoBrazilian Bariatric Endoscopy International Group, São Paulo, Brazil.
Josemberg Marins CamposBrazilian Bariatric Endoscopy International Group, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto Luiz Kaiser JuniorDepartment of Endoscopy and Bariatric Surgery, Kaiser Clinic and Day Hospital, São José do Rio Preto, SP, 15015-110, Brazil.
Eduardo GreccoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, School of Medicine of ABC, Santo Andre, SP, 09080-650, Brazil.
Mario Flamini JuniorDepartment of Endoscopy and Bariatric Surgery, Kaiser Clinic and Day Hospital, São José do Rio Preto, SP, 15015-110, Brazil.
Marcelo Falcao de SantanaBrazilian Bariatric Endoscopy International Group, São Paulo, Brazil.
Idiberto Jose Zotarelli FilhoState University of Sao Paulo-Unesp-Ibilce, Rua Cristovão Colombo 2265, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, 15054-000, Brazil.
Adriano Augusto Tomas Vasconcelos Almeida AlexandreDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBetween 10 and 20% of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery procedures regain weight secondary to a gastrojejunostomy enlargement. The aim of this study was to validate the interobserver agreement while measuring gastric outlet diameters using a new standard guidewire.

methodsWe selected thirty-five videos of consecutive endoscopic procedures on patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure. All videos were evaluated by four raters: two expert endoscopists and two trainees. We excluded videos having a slipped Fobi ring or a strictured gastric outlet. Anastomosis diameter was measured using a novel device with standardized markings on a guidewire (Hydra jagwire, Boston Scientific, Natick. MA) as well as the current gold standard defined as a calibrated endoscopic measuring instrument (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA).

resultsWe obtained 272 measurements of the gastric outlet. Overall agreement measured through intra-class correlation coefficients for the gold standard was 0.84 (p < 0.01) and 0.83 (p < 0.01) for the new guidewire. Agreement among experts was 0.699 (p < 0.01), while among trainees it was 0.822 (p < 0.01).

conclusionThe new guidewire demonstrated a high degree of observer reliability, also presenting similar results between expert endoscopists and trainees.

Indexed as

EndoscopesAdultAnastomosis, Roux-en-YBariatric SurgeryCalibrationEndoscopyEquipment DesignFemaleGastric BypassHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsStomachGastric outletMeasurement reliabilityObserver agreementUpper endoscopyWeight recidivismWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID28057045
PMCPMC5217566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.