Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28056949›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

The treatment of non-malarial febrile illness in Papua New Guinea: findings from cross sectional and longitudinal studies of health worker practice.

Olga P M Saweri, Manuel W Hetzel, Ivo Mueller, Peter M Siba, Justin Pulford

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A 14-day follow-up of adult non-malarial fever patients seen by mobile clinics in rural Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga P M SaweriPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNGIMR), PO Box 60, Goroka, EHP 441, Papua New Guinea.
Manuel W HetzelSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, PO Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Ivo MuellerBarcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.
Peter M SibaPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNGIMR), PO Box 60, Goroka, EHP 441, Papua New Guinea.
Justin PulfordPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNGIMR), PO Box 60, Goroka, EHP 441, Papua New Guinea. pulford1974@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-8480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Papua New Guinea Department of Health recently shifted from a presumptive to a 'test and treat' malaria case management policy. This shift was supported by the widespread introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in health facilities across the country. Health workers received training and job-aids detailing how to conduct and interpret a malaria rapid diagnostic test and how to treat test positive cases; however, little instruction on treating non-malaria febrile cases was provided. Accordingly, this study examined health worker case management of non-malarial febrile patients in the 12-month period immediately following the introduction of the revised malaria case management policy.

methodsData were collected from a country-wide cross-sectional survey of febrile case management at randomly selected health facilities and from longitudinal surveillance at sentinel health facilities. Analysis was restricted to febrile patients who tested negative for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test (N=303 and 5705 outpatients, respectively). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 96.8% of non-malarial febrile patients received a diagnosis in the longitudinal sample, compared to 52.4% of the cross-sectional sample. Respiratory tract infections were the most commonly reported diagnoses. Over 90% of patients in both samples were prescribed one or more medications, most commonly an analgesic (71.3 & 72.9% of the longitudinal and cross-sectional samples, respectively), some form of antibiotic (72.7 & 73.4%, respectively) and/or an anthelminthic (17.9 & 16.5%, respectively). Prescribing behaviour was adherent with the recommendations in the standard treatment guidelines in fewer than 20% of cases (longitudinal sample only).

conclusionMany non-malarial febrile patients are not provided with a diagnosis. When diagnoses are provided they are typically some form of respiratory tract infection. Antibiotics and analgesics are widely prescribed, although medications prescribed rarely adhere to the Papua New Guinea standard treatment guidelines. These findings indicate that Papua New Guinea health workers require support for non-malarial febrile illness case management.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase ManagementChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleFeverHealth FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnosisFebrileHealth worker practiceMalariaPrescriptionTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28056949
PMCPMC5217620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.