Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28056934›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2017

Risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a retrospective cohort study.

Dongbin Liu, Feng Cao, Jiafeng Liu, Dahua Xu, Yuehua Wang, Fei Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dongbin LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. Liudongbin90266@sohu.com.
Feng CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Jiafeng LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Dahua XuDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Yuehua WangDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Fei LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been widely adopted because of the efficacy and safety in treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, the risk factors for bile leakage, the most common complication after primary closure, has not been clarified yet.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCBDE with primary closure after choledochotomy between Feb. 2012 and Jun. 2016 was performed. Risk factors for bile leakage were identified by logistic regression inculding demographic factors, preoperative condition and surgical details.

resultsBetween Feb. 2012 and Jun. 2016, a total of 265 LCBDE procedures were applied in our hospital and 141 patients with primary closure were included in this study. Bile leakage occurred in 11.3% (16/141) of these patients, and happened more frequently in patients with slender CBD (<1 vs ≥1 cm, 31.6% vs 7.0%, p = 0.04) and those managed by inexperienced surgeons (initial 70 cases vs later cases, 17.1% vs 5.6%, p = 0.04). After multivariable regression, the diameter of CBD [OR 95% CI, 3.799 (1.081-13.349), p = 0.04] and experience of surgeons [OR 95% CI, 4.228 (1.330-13.438), p = 0.03] were significantly related to bile leakage.

conclusionSlender CBD and inexperienced surgeons were the high risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following LCBDE.

Indexed as

BileAdultAgedBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCommon Bile DuctFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBile leakageLaparoscopic common bile duct explorationPrimary closure

Identifiers

PMID28056934
PMCPMC5217550
OpenAlexW2569071875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.