Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28056814›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2017

Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi.

Maja Hilber-Bodmer, Michael Schmid, Christian H Ahrens, Florian M Freimoser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pulcherrimin and Beyond: The Multifaceted Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Prevalence ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Evaluating the Role of Nutrient Competition inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pantothenate Auxotrophy in a Naturally Occurring Biocontrol Yeast.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Mechanisms of Action of Microbial Biocontrol Agents againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maja Hilber-BodmerAgroscope, Institute for Plant Production Sciences IPS, Schloss 1, P.B., 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Michael SchmidAgroscope, Institute for Plant Production Sciences IPS, Schloss 1, P.B., 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Christian H AhrensAgroscope, Institute for Plant Production Sciences IPS, Schloss 1, P.B., 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Florian M FreimoserAgroscope, Institute for Plant Production Sciences IPS, Schloss 1, P.B., 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland. florian.freimoser@agroscope.admin.ch.
Agroscope · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile recent advances in next generation sequencing technologies have enabled researchers to readily identify countless microbial species in soil, rhizosphere, and phyllosphere microbiomes, the biological functions of the majority of these species are unknown. Functional studies are therefore urgently needed in order to characterize the plethora of microorganisms that are being identified and to point out species that may be used for biotechnology or plant protection. Here, we used a dual culture assay and growth analyses to characterise yeasts (40 different isolates) and their antagonistic effect on 16 filamentous fungi; comprising plant pathogens, antagonists, and saprophytes.

resultsOverall, this competition screen of 640 pairwise combinations revealed a broad range of outcomes, ranging from small stimulatory effects of some yeasts up to a growth inhibition of more than 80% by individual species. On average, yeasts isolated from soil suppressed filamentous fungi more strongly than phyllosphere yeasts and the antagonistic activity was a species-/isolate-specific property and not dependent on the filamentous fungus a yeast was interacting with. The isolates with the strongest antagonistic activity were Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Hanseniaspora sp., Cyberlindnera sargentensis, Aureobasidium pullulans, Candida subhashii, and Pichia kluyveri. Among these, the soil yeasts (C. sargentensis, A. pullulans, C. subhashii) assimilated and/or oxidized more di-, tri- and tetrasaccharides and organic acids than yeasts from the phyllosphere. Only the two yeasts C. subhashii and M. pulcherrima were able to grow with N-acetyl-glucosamine as carbon source.

conclusionsThe competition assays and physiological experiments described here identified known antagonists that have been implicated in the biological control of plant pathogenic fungi in the past, but also little characterised species such as C. subhashii. Overall, soil yeasts were more antagonistic and metabolically versatile than yeasts from the phyllosphere. Noteworthy was the strong antagonistic activity of the soil yeast C. subhashii, which had so far only been described from a clinical sample and not been studied with respect to biocontrol. Based on binary competition assays and growth analyses (e.g., on different carbon sources, growth in root exudates), C. subhashii was identified as a competitive and antagonistic soil yeast with potential as a novel biocontrol agent against plant pathogenic fungi.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBiological Control AgentsSoil MicrobiologyCandidaDNA, FungalFungiGenome, FungalGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMalusPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereSoilBiological Control AgentsDNA, FungalSoilAntagonismBiocontrolCandidaFungal plant pathogenMitochondrial genomePlant protectionYeast

Identifiers

PMID28056814
PMCPMC5216558
OpenAlexW2569556289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.