SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2017
Is the concomitant use of clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors still associated with increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes following coronary angioplasty?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published studies (2012 - 2016).
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of drug interactions in hospitalised elderly patients: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2019Pooled it
- Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Head to head comparison of Prasugrel versus Ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinical Outcomes of Tegoprazan Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective, Observational Study.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clopidogrel on Recurrent Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Proton pump inhibitors and gastroprotection in patients treated with antithrombotic drugs: A cardiologic point of view.World journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- Concomitant Use of Antiplatelet Agents and Proton-Pump Inhibitors Increases the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study Using Balanced Operational Definitions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors.Chonnam medical journal · 2023Review
- Article
- The Safety of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Cardiovascular Health: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- An Up-to-Date Article Regarding Particularities of Drug Treatment in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Antithrombotic Therapy: Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis and Atherothrombosis.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Article
- Underutilization of Peptic Ulcer Disease Prophylaxis Among Elderly Users of Antiplatelets and Anticoagulants.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Potential drug-drug interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases: findings from a prospective observational study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021Article
- The Role of Genetic Polymorphism and Other Factors on Clopidogrel Resistance (CR) in an Asian Population with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControversies were previously observed with the concomitant use of clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), especially omeprazole, following coronary angioplasty. Even though several studies showed no interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs, questions have been raised about the decrease in antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel with PPIs. A previously published meta-analysis showed concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs to be associated with higher adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, data which were used were extracted from studies published before the year 2012. Whether these controversies still exist in this new era is not clear. Therefore, we aim to show if the concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs is still associated with higher adverse outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) using data obtained from recently published studies (2012 to 2016).
methodsElectronic databases were searched for recent publications (2012-2016) comparing (clopidogrel plus PPIs) versus clopidogrel alone following PCI. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were considered as the clinical endpoints. Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were used as the statistical parameters and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.
resultsEleven studies with a total number of 84,729 patients (29,235 patients from the PPIs group versus 55,494 patients from the non-PPIs group) were included. Results of this analysis showed that short term mortality and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) significantly favored the non-PPIs group with OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.43-1.68, P < 0.00001 and OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06-1.49, P = 0.009 respectively. Long-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs), Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stent Thrombosis (ST) and TVR significantly favored patients who did not use PPIs with OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.23-1.53, P < 0.00001, OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.26-1.57, P < 0.00001 and OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.13-1.70, P = 0.002 and OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.61, P = 0.04 respectively. However, the result for long term mortality was not statistically significant.
conclusionThe combined use of clopidogrel with PPIs is still associated with significantly higher adverse cardiovascular events such as MACEs, ST and MI following PCI supporting results of the previously published meta-analysis. However, long-term mortality is not statistically significant warranting further analysis with randomized patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.