ArticleBMC genomics2017
Identification of coding and non-coding mutational hotspots in cancer genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Hot and Cold Regions for Mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli tdk Gene: A Catalog of Mutational Sites.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Discovery of Cis-Regulatory Mechanisms via Non-Coding Mutations in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2025Article
- The mutational landscape and functional effects of noncoding ultraconserved elements in human cancers.Science advances · 2025Article
- Integrating Clinical Cancer and PTM Proteomics Data Identifies a Mechanism of ACK1 Kinase Activation.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2024Article
- Genetic Variants in the Adhesive G Protein-Coupled Receptor ADGRG6 are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to COPD in the Elderly Han Chinese Population of Southern China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Widespread perturbation of ETS factor binding sites in cancer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The MLL3/4 complexes and MiDAC co-regulate H4K20ac to control a specific gene expression program.Life science alliance · 2022Article
- Article
- Long Noncoding RNAs: New Regulators of Resistance to Systemic Therapies for Gastric Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Genomic Instability Signature of Palindromic Non-Coding Somatic Mutations in Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2020Article
- The MiDAC histone deacetylase complex is essential for embryonic development and has a unique multivalent structure.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Non-coding somatic mutations converge on the PAX8 pathway in ovarian cancer.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Structural basis for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126 function.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Computational methods for detecting cancer hotspots.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Identification of putative regulatory regions and transcription factors associated with intramuscular fat content traits.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Identification of Single Nucleotide Non-coding Driver Mutations in Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of mutations that play a causal role in tumour development, so called "driver" mutations, is of critical importance for understanding how cancers form and how they might be treated. Several large cancer sequencing projects have identified genes that are recurrently mutated in cancer patients, suggesting a role in tumourigenesis. While the landscape of coding drivers has been extensively studied and many of the most prominent driver genes are well characterised, comparatively less is known about the role of mutations in the non-coding regions of the genome in cancer development. The continuing fall in genome sequencing costs has resulted in a concomitant increase in the number of cancer whole genome sequences being produced, facilitating systematic interrogation of both the coding and non-coding regions of cancer genomes.
resultsTo examine the mutational landscapes of tumour genomes we have developed a novel method to identify mutational hotspots in tumour genomes using both mutational data and information on evolutionary conservation. We have applied our methodology to over 1300 whole cancer genomes and show that it identifies prominent coding and non-coding regions that are known or highly suspected to play a role in cancer. Importantly, we applied our method to the entire genome, rather than relying on predefined annotations (e.g. promoter regions) and we highlight recurrently mutated regions that may have resulted from increased exposure to mutational processes rather than selection, some of which have been identified previously as targets of selection. Finally, we implicate several pan-cancer and cancer-specific candidate non-coding regions, which could be involved in tumourigenesis.
conclusionsWe have developed a framework to identify mutational hotspots in cancer genomes, which is applicable to the entire genome. This framework identifies known and novel coding and non-coding mutional hotspots and can be used to differentiate candidate driver regions from likely passenger regions susceptible to somatic mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.