Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28056771›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

The use of novel selectivity metrics in kinase research.

Nicolas Bosc, Christophe Meyer, Pascal Bonnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovery of IRAK4 InhibitorsJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is Structure-Based Drug Design Ready for Selectivity Optimization?Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. How We Think about Targeting RNA with Small Molecules.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas BoscInstitut de Chimie Organique et Analytique (ICOA), UMR CNRS-Université d'Orléans 7311, Université d'Orléans BP 6759, Orléans Cedex 2, 45067, France.
Christophe MeyerJanssen-Cilag, Centre de Recherche Pharma Janssen-Cilag, Campus de Maigremont-CS 10615, Chaussée du Vexin, Val de Reuil, 27106, France.
Pascal BonnetInstitut de Chimie Organique et Analytique (ICOA), UMR CNRS-Université d'Orléans 7311, Université d'Orléans BP 6759, Orléans Cedex 2, 45067, France. pascal.bonnet@univ-orleans.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-138X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompound selectivity is an important issue when developing a new drug. In many instances, a lack of selectivity can translate to increased toxicity. Protein kinases are particularly concerned with this issue because they share high sequence and structural similarity. However, selectivity may be assessed early on using data generated from protein kinase profiling panels.

resultsTo guide lead optimization in drug discovery projects, we propose herein two new selectivity metrics, namely window score (WS) and ranking score (RS). These metrics can be applied to standard in vitro data-including intrinsic enzyme activity/affinity (Ki, IC

conclusionsWe performed a comparative analysis of their respective performance on several data sets against already published selectivity metrics and analyzed how they might influence compound selection. Our results showed that the two new metrics bring additional information to prioritize compound selection. Two novel metrics were developed to better estimate selectivity of compounds screened on multiple proteins.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, TheoreticalProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesEntropy scoreGini scoreKinase inhibitorPartition indexProtein kinaseRanking scoreSelectivityWindow score

Identifiers

PMID28056771
PMCPMC5217660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.