Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28056453›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Reduction of Motion Artifacts and Noise Using Independent Component Analysis in Task-Based Functional MRI for Preoperative Planning in Patients with Brain Tumor.

E H Middlebrooks, C J Frost, I S Tuna, I M Schmalfuss, M Rahman, A Old Crow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E H MiddlebrooksFrom the Department of Radiology (E.H.M.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama ehmiddlebrooks@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4418-9605
C J FrostDepartment of Biology (C.J.F.), University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-8646
I S TunaDepartments of Radiology (I.S.T., I.M.S., A.O.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-4170-6483
I M SchmalfussDepartments of Radiology (I.S.T., I.M.S., A.O.C.).ORCID 0000-0001-5309-0984
M RahmanNeurosurgery (M.R.), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-3193-1273
A Old CrowDepartments of Radiology (I.S.T., I.M.S., A.O.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-9102-5793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlthough it is a potentially powerful presurgical tool, fMRI can be fraught with artifacts, leading to interpretive errors, many of which are not fully accounted for in routinely applied correction methods. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of data denoising by independent component analysis in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation for glioma resection compared with more routinely applied correction methods such as realignment or motion scrubbing. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-five functional runs (both motor and language) in 12 consecutive patients with glioma were analyzed retrospectively by double-blind review. Data were processed and compared with the following: 1) realignment alone, 2) motion scrubbing, 3) independent component analysis denoising, and 4) both independent component analysis denoising and motion scrubbing. Primary outcome measures included a change in false-positives, false-negatives,

resultsIndependent component analysis denoising reduced false-positives in 63% of studies versus realignment alone. There was also an increase in the

conclusionsThe addition of independent component analysis denoising of fMRI data in preoperative patients with glioma has a significant impact on data quality, resulting in reduced false-positives and an increase in true-positives compared with more commonly applied motion scrubbing or simple realignment methods.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28056453
PMCPMC7963830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.