ArticlePloS one2017
Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases from French veal calves: WGS-based data will help build targeted AMR mitigation strategies.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- A Bibliometric and Systematic Review of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment in Food Safety (1995-2024).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Distribution and characteristics of ceftiofur-resistant Escherichia coli throughout the broiler production chain in Korea.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Simulation model to estimate the burden of disease due to hepatitis E virus in Dutch pig meat and cost-effectiveness of control measures.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Edible river fish-derived extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales harboring transferable plasmids encodingOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Quantitative microbial risk assessment for ingestion of antibiotic resistance genes from private wells contaminated by human and livestock fecal sources.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Detection of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Products Estimated with a Semiquantitative Infectivity Assay.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The Heat Is On: Modeling the Persistence of ESBL-ProducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Incidence and predictors ofEpidemiology and infection · 2022Article
- Critically Important Antimicrobial Resistance Trends inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Raw Meat Contaminated with Cephalosporin-ResistantMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Farm-to-Fork Quantitative Microbial Exposure Assessment of β-Lactam-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- F Plasmid Lineages in Escherichia coli ST95: Implications for Host Range, Antibiotic Resistance, and Zoonoses.mSystems · 2022Article
- Impact of long-term dietary habits on the human gut resistome in the Dutch population.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Consumer Exposure to Resistant Bacteria through Chicken Meat Consumption in Germany.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Population structure and uropathogenic potential of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from retail chicken meat.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- High Carriage Rate of Extended-SpectrumInternational journal of microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the consumption of meat from different food animals. Calculations were done with a simplified Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) model. The model took the effect of pre-retail processing, storage at the consumers home and preparation in the kitchen (cross-contamination and heating) on EEC numbers on/in the raw meat products into account. The contribution of beef products (78%) to the total EEC exposure of the Dutch population through the consumption of meat was much higher than for chicken (18%), pork (4.5%), veal (0.1%) and lamb (0%). After slaughter, chicken meat accounted for 97% of total EEC load on meat, but chicken meat experienced a relatively large effect of heating during food preparation. Exposure via consumption of filet americain (a minced beef product consumed raw) was predicted to be highest (61% of total EEC exposure), followed by chicken fillet (13%). It was estimated that only 18% of EEC exposure occurred via cross-contamination during preparation in the kitchen, which was the only route by which EEC survived for surface-contaminated products. Sensitivity analysis showed that model output is not sensitive for most parameters. However, EEC concentration on meat other than chicken meat was an important data gap. In conclusion, the model assessed that consumption of beef products led to a higher exposure to EEC than chicken products, although the prevalence of EEC on raw chicken meat was much higher than on beef. The (relative) risk of this exposure for public health is yet unknown given the lack of a modelling framework and of exposure studies for other potential transmission routes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.