ArticlePloS one2017
Comparison of Primary Care Experiences in Village Clinics with Different Ownership Models in Guangdong Province, China.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-centered medical home and the quality of primary care: survey study with patients and administrators of community healthcare centers in Shanghai, China.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Attributes of primary health care in Mato Grosso do Sul state: PCAT-Brazil paired for users and health professionals, 2018.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The quality of primary care performance in private sector facilities in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional descriptive survey.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Association between resident status and patients' experiences of primary care: a cross-sectional study in the Greater Bay Area, China.BMJ open · 2022Article
- [Measuring comprehensiveness of care using the Primary Care Assessment Tool: systematic reviewEvaluación de la integralidad en la atención primaria de salud por medio de la herramienta de evaluación de la atención primaria: revisión sistemática].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Comparing the Quality of Primary Care between Public and Private Providers in Urban China: A Standardized Patient Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Comparison of Patients' Perceived Quality of Primary Care Between Urban and Rural Community Health Centers in Guangdong, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Prioritizing the perceived equity of the residents to construct an equitable health care system: evidence from a national cross-sectional study in China.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Development of primary care assessment tool-adult version in Tibet: implication for low- and middle-income countries.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Patient experiences of primary care quality amongst different types of health care facilities in central Vietnam.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Satisfaction with service coverage and drug list may influence patients' acceptance of general practitioner contract service: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong, China.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Article
- Effect of family practice contract services on the quality of primary care in Guangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study using PCAT-AE.BMJ open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn order to improve the quality of services at village clinics (VCs), which are important primary care service providers in rural China, the Chinese government has encouraged the township hospitals to own and manage VCs. There are currently three models of ownership and management of VCs: township hospital-owned and -managed (HVC), village committee-owned and -managed (VVC), and private-owned and -managed (PVC). This study aims to examine the association between these ownership models of VCs and patients' primary care experiences.
methodsVillagers were selected by multistage stratified sampling and their experiences with primary care were measured using the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Edition (PCAT-AS). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and the questionnaires administered by investigators in the cross-sectional study from February to April 2015. The PCAT scores were compared among the three models by covariance analysis, and multiple linear regression was used to analyze factors associated with the PCAT total scores.
resultsA total of 1491 questionnaires were collected. After controlling for covariates, HVCs reported the highest PCAT scores and satisfaction rate. In terms of the domains, HVC reported the highest scores in the coordination and comprehensiveness domains, while PVC had the highest scores in the first contact-accessibility domain. Multivariate linear regression showed that HVC, married participants, aged 60 and older, satisfied with the services, receiving six or more visits, and those with medical expenditures over 20% of their total family expenditures, were also positively associated with better primary care quality.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that villagers receiving medical care at HVCs perceived better primary care than those at PVCs and VVCs. In order to improve the quality of primary care at VCs, it is necessary to increase government subsidies for public service packages, tighten the township hospital's supervision of PVCs and VVCs, and develop performance-based incentive plans to motivate improvements in the accessibility of HVCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.