The Case for Maternal Postpartum Deworming.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. High prevalence of helminth infections in mother-child pairs from three central provinces of Lao People's Democratic Republic.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2019
   Article
2. The right to deworming: The case for girls and women of reproductive age.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018
   Article
3. Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal parasitic infections in pregnant women residing in three districts of Bogotá, Colombia.BMC public health · 2018
   Article
4. Estimation of the number of women of reproductive age in need of preventive chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminth infections.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as