ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2017
Gene length as a biological timer to establish temporal transcriptional regulation.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of epigenetic regulator gene families in the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Temporal characterisation and electrophysiological implications of TBI-induced serine/threonine kinase activity in mouse cortex.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Transcriptional coordination between intergenic RNA polymerase II-bound regions and nearby genes reveals functional specialization and disease associations in peripheral blood.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Comprehensive blueprint of Salmonella genomic plasticity identifies hotspots for pathogenicity genes.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Embryo-endometrial interaction associated with the location of the embryo during the mobility phase in mares.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Non-canonical retinoid signaling in neural development, regeneration and synaptic function.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Age or lifestyle-induced accumulation of genotoxicity is associated with a length-dependent decrease in gene expression.iScience · 2023Article
- Does the Pachytene Checkpoint, a Feature of Meiosis, Filter Out Mistakes in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair and as a side-Effect Strongly Promote Adaptive Speciation?Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Codon Usage Bias Correlates With Gene Length in Neurodegeneration Associated Genes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Gene Size Matters: An Analysis of Gene Length in the Human Genome.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Characterization of novel primary miRNA transcription units in human cells using Bru-seq nascent RNA sequencing.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A report on DNA sequence determinants in gene expression.Bioinformation · 2020Article
- Intronic CNVs and gene expression variation in human populations.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Defective transcription elongation in a subset of cancers confers immunotherapy resistance.Nature communications · 2018Article
- What does time mean in development?Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptional timing is inherently influenced by gene length, thus providing a mechanism for temporal regulation of gene expression. While gene size has been shown to be important for the expression timing of specific genes during early development, whether it plays a role in the timing of other global gene expression programs has not been extensively explored. Here, we investigate the role of gene length during the early transcriptional response of human fibroblasts to serum stimulation. Using the nascent sequencing techniques Bru-seq and BruUV-seq, we identified immediate genome-wide transcriptional changes following serum stimulation that were linked to rapid activation of enhancer elements. We identified 873 significantly induced and 209 significantly repressed genes. Variations in gene size allowed for a large group of genes to be simultaneously activated but produce full-length RNAs at different times. The median length of the group of serum-induced genes was significantly larger than the median length of all expressed genes, housekeeping genes, and serum-repressed genes. These gene length relationships were also observed in corresponding mouse orthologs, suggesting that relative gene size is evolutionarily conserved. The sizes of transcription factor and microRNA genes immediately induced after serum stimulation varied dramatically, setting up a cascade mechanism for temporal expression arising from a single activation event. The retention and expansion of large intronic sequences during evolution have likely played important roles in fine-tuning the temporal expression of target genes in various cellular response programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.