Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28055023›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on the pharyngeal swallow in neonates.

L Ferrara, A Bidiwala, I Sher, M Pirzada, D Barlev, S Islam, W Rosenfeld, C C Crowley, N Hanna

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Oral-feeding guidelines for preterm neonates in the NICU: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  20. The effects of oral feeding while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L FerraraDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3217-676X
A BidiwalaDivision of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, USA.
I SherDepartment of Radiology, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
M PirzadaDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
D BarlevDepartment of Radiology, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
S IslamDepartment of Biostatistics, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
W RosenfeldDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
C C CrowleyHearing and Speech Center, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
N HannaDivision of Neonatology, Children's Medical Center at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
Winthrop-University Hospital · USChildren's Hospital at Montefiore · USLong Island Jewish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFeeding neonates orally while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is a common practice. We hypothesize that pressurized airflow provided by nCPAP will alter the swallowing mechanism in neonates, increasing the risk of aspiration during oral feeding. STUDY

designInfants receiving nCPAP with a RAM cannula and tolerating at least 50% of their feeding orally were included in the study (one term; six preterm infants). Each participant underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study while on nCPAP and off nCPAP. A non-parametric signed-rank test was used for paired data.

resultThe incidence of deep penetration (P=0.03) and aspiration (P=0.01) decreased significantly off-nCPAP compared with on-nCPAP. However, the incidence of mild penetration (P=0.65) and nasopharyngeal reflux (P=0.87) remained the same under both conditions.

conclusionOral feeding while on-nCPAP significantly increases the risk of laryngeal penetration and tracheal aspiration events. We recommend caution when initiating oral feedings on nCPAP.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMalePharynxUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28055023
OpenAlexW2567899268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.