Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28054972›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

Introduction of Complementary Foods in a Cohort of Infants in Northeast Italy: Do Parents Comply with WHO Recommendations?

Claudia Carletti, Paola Pani, Lorenzo Monasta, Alessandra Knowles, Adriano Cattaneo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors Influencing the Age of Complementary Feeding-A Cross-Sectional Study from Two European Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia CarlettiClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste 34137, Italy. claudiaveronica.carletti@burlo.trieste.it.
Paola PaniClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste 34137, Italy. paola.pani@burlo.trieste.it.
Lorenzo MonastaClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste 34137, Italy. lorenzo.monasta@burlo.trieste.it.
Alessandra KnowlesClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste 34137, Italy. alessandra.knowles@burlo.trieste.it.
Adriano CattaneoClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste 34137, Italy. adriano.cattaneo@gmail.com.
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timing and type of complementary food in infancy affect nutritional status and health later in life. The objective of this paper was to assess complementary feeding practices, looking at timing, type, and compliance with World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Data were obtained from a birth cohort of 400 infants, enrolled in Trieste (Italy) between July 2007 and July 2008 and followed up for three years, using a "food introduction timing table". Five WHO recommendations standards were used to assess parental compliance and associated factors. Thirty seven percent of mothers returned the completed "timing table" up until the child was three years of age. Eighty six percent of infants were already receiving complementary foods at six months. The first food type to be introduced was fresh fruit (170 days from birth, median). Overall, infants shared a very similar diet, which was different from the family diet and characterized by delayed introduction of certain food types. Five percent of parents complied with either all five or only one of the WHO recommendations, 34% with three, and 35% with four. The parents' partial compliance with WHO recommendations is probably due to conflicting information received from different sources. This advocates for national evidence-based guidelines, supported and promoted by health professionals.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPatient ComplianceRecommended Dietary AllowancesWorld Health OrganizationAdultCohort StudiesDairy ProductsDietEdible GrainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFruitHumansInfantItalyLogistic Modelscomplementary feedingcompliance with WHO recommendationinfant nutritionItalytiming of introduction of complementary food

Identifiers

PMID28054972
PMCPMC5295078
OpenAlexW2569986571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.