ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017
Three-Dimensional Electrodes for High-Performance Bioelectrochemical Systems.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology for water disinfection and biofilm control: mechanisms, applications, and future outlook.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Harnessing the power of microbial fuel cells as pioneering green technology: advancing sustainable energy and wastewater treatment through innovative nanotechnology.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Review
- Electrofermentation increases concentration of poly γ-glutamic acid in Bacillus subtilis biofilms.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Methodology for In Situ Microsensor Profiling of Hydrogen, pH, Oxidation-Reduction Potential, and Electric Potential throughout Three-Dimensional Porous Cathodes of (Bio)Electrochemical Systems.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Performance and microbial community analysis on nitrate removal in a bioelectrochemical reactor.PloS one · 2023Article
- Wastewater-powered high-value chemical synthesis in a hybrid bioelectrochemical system.iScience · 2021Article
- A novel fragmented anode biofilm microbial fuel cell (FAB-MFC) integrated system for domestic wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2021Article
- Redox Potential Heterogeneity in Fixed-Bed Electrodes Leads to Microbial Stratification and Inhomogeneous Performance.ChemSusChem · 2021Article
- Three-Dimensional Cathodes for Electrochemical Reduction of CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Development and characterisation of self-assembled graphene hydrogel-based anodes for bioelectrochemical systems.RSC advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) are groups of bioelectrochemical technologies and platforms that could facilitate versatile environmental and biological applications. The performance of BES is mainly determined by the key process of electron transfer at the bacteria and electrode interface, which is known as extracellular electron transfer (EET). Thus, developing novel electrodes to encourage bacteria attachment and enhance EET efficiency is of great significance. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) electrodes, which provide large specific area for bacteria attachment and macroporous structures for substrate diffusion, have emerged as a promising electrode for high-performance BES. Herein, a comprehensive review of versatile methodology developed for 3D electrode fabrication is presented. This review article is organized based on the categorization of 3D electrode fabrication strategy and BES performance comparison. In particular, the advantages and shortcomings of these 3D electrodes are presented and their future development is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.