Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28054919›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Opposite initialization to novel cues in dopamine signaling in ventral and posterior striatum in mice.

William Menegas, Benedicte M Babayan, Naoshige Uchida, Mitsuko Watabe-Uchida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 278 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anabolic androgenic steroids induce distinct monoaminergic and lipidomic alterations in the male rat brain.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Motor-to-Limbic Design of Direct Synaptic Communication between Dopamine Neurons in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mesocorticostriatal Reinforcement Learning of State Representation and Value with Implications for the Mechanisms of Schizophrenia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A brief history of dopamine prediction errors.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

William MenegasDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
Benedicte M BabayanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
Naoshige UchidaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5755-9409
Mitsuko Watabe-UchidaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7864-754X
Harvard University · US

Funding

Context dependent modulations of dopamine signalingR01MH110404 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI UCHIDA, NAOSHIGE · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Neural circuits that regulate dopamine neuron activityR01MH095953 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI UCHIDA, NAOSHIGE · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Experimental examinations of the mechanisms that generate the responses of midbraR01MH101207 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI UCHIDA, NAOSHIGE · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095953NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101207NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine neurons are thought to encode novelty in addition to reward prediction error (the discrepancy between actual and predicted values). In this study, we compared dopamine activity across the striatum using fiber fluorometry in mice. During classical conditioning, we observed opposite dynamics in dopamine axon signals in the ventral striatum ('VS dopamine') and the posterior tail of the striatum ('TS dopamine'). TS dopamine showed strong excitation to novel cues, whereas VS dopamine showed no responses to novel cues until they had been paired with a reward. TS dopamine cue responses decreased over time, depending on what the cue predicted. Additionally, TS dopamine showed excitation to several types of stimuli including rewarding, aversive, and neutral stimuli whereas VS dopamine showed excitation only to reward or reward-predicting cues. Together, these results demonstrate that dopamine novelty signals are localized in TS along with general salience signals, while VS dopamine reliably encodes reward prediction error.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsFluorometryMiceSympathomimeticsVentral StriatumDopamineSympathomimeticsdopaminelearningmouseneurosciencenoveltyrewardstriatum

Identifiers

PMID28054919
PMCPMC5271609
OpenAlexW2571008383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.