Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28054195›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

Innovative Power of Health Care Organisations Affects IT Adoption: A bi-National Health IT Benchmark Comparing Austria and Germany.

Jens Hüsers, Ursula Hübner, Moritz Esdar, Elske Ammenwerth, Werner O Hackl, Laura Naumann, Jan David Liebe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jens HüsersHealth Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück - UAS, Caprivistraße 30A, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-9155
Ursula HübnerHealth Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück - UAS, Caprivistraße 30A, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany. u.huebner@hs-osnabrueck.de.
Moritz EsdarHealth Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück - UAS, Caprivistraße 30A, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
Elske AmmenwerthInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, Medical Informatics and Technology, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.
Werner O HacklInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, Medical Informatics and Technology, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.
Laura NaumannHealth Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück - UAS, Caprivistraße 30A, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
Jan David LiebeHealth Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück - UAS, Caprivistraße 30A, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multinational health IT benchmarks foster cross-country learning and have been employed at various levels, e.g. OECD and Nordic countries. A bi-national benchmark study conducted in 2007 revealed a significantly higher adoption of health IT in Austria compared to Germany, two countries with comparable healthcare systems. We now investigated whether these differences still persisted. We further studied whether these differences were associated with hospital intrinsic factors, i.e. the innovative power of the organisation and hospital demographics. We thus performed a survey to measure the "perceived IT availability" and the "innovative power of the hospital" of 464 German and 70 Austrian hospitals. The survey was based on a questionnaire with 52 items and was given to the directors of nursing in 2013/2014. Our findings confirmed a significantly greater IT availability in Austria than in Germany. This was visible in the aggregated IT adoption composite score "IT function" as well as in the IT adoption for the individual functions "nursing documentation" (OR = 5.98), "intensive care unit (ICU) documentation" (OR = 2.49), "medication administration documentation" (OR = 2.48), "electronic archive" (OR = 2.27) and "medication" (OR = 2.16). "Innovative power" was the strongest factor to explain the variance of the composite score "IT function". It was effective in hospitals of both countries but significantly more effective in Austria than in Germany. "Hospital size" and "hospital system affiliation" were also significantly associated with the composite score "IT function", but they did not differ between the countries. These findings can be partly associated with the national characteristics. Indicators point to a more favourable financial situation in Austrian hospitals; we thus argue that Austrian hospitals may possess a larger degree of financial freedom to be innovative and to act accordingly. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate the effect of "innovative power" in hospitals on health IT adoption in a bi-national health IT benchmark. We recommend directly including the financial situation into future regression models. On a political level, measures to stimulate the "innovative power" of hospitals should be considered to increase the digitalisation of healthcare.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationAustriaBenchmarkingDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsGermanyHospital AdministrationHospital Bed CapacityHumansInformation SystemsIntensive Care UnitsMedication SystemsAustriaeHealthGermanyHealth ITIT adoptionIT benchmarking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.