Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28054097›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2017

Prolonged sitting may increase diabetes risk in physically inactive individuals: an 11 year follow-up of the HUNT Study, Norway.

Bjørn O Åsvold, Kristian Midthjell, Steinar Krokstad, Vegar Rangul, Adrian Bauman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sedentary lifestyle and body composition in type 2 diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Reducing Sedentary Time among Older Adults in Assisted Living: Perceptions, Barriers, and Motivators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bjørn O ÅsvoldHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Forskningsveien 2, N-7600, Levanger, Norway. bjorn.o.asvold@ntnu.no.
Kristian MidthjellHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Forskningsveien 2, N-7600, Levanger, Norway.
Steinar KrokstadHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Forskningsveien 2, N-7600, Levanger, Norway.
Vegar RangulHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Forskningsveien 2, N-7600, Levanger, Norway.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe examined the association between sitting time and diabetes incidence, overall and by strata of leisure-time physical activity and BMI.

methodsWe followed 28,051 adult participants of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (the HUNT Study), a population-based study, for diabetes incidence from 1995-1997 to 2006-2008 and estimated HRs of any diabetes by categories of self-reported total daily sitting time at baseline.

resultsOf 28,051 participants, 1253 (4.5%) developed diabetes during 11 years of follow-up. Overall, sitting ≥8 h/day was associated with a 17% (95% CI 2, 34) higher risk of developing diabetes compared with sitting ≤4 h/day, adjusted for age, sex and education. However, the association was attenuated to a non-significant 9% (95% CI -5, 26) increase in risk after adjustment for leisure-time physical activity and BMI. The association between sitting time and diabetes risk differed by leisure-time physical activity (p CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationOur findings suggest that total sitting time has little association with diabetes risk in the population as a whole, but prolonged sitting may contribute to an increased diabetes risk among physically inactive people.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAdultBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFemaleHumansIncidenceLeisure ActivitiesMaleMiddle AgedEpidemiologySedentary lifestyleType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.