Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053720›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2015

The effect of ankle joint mobility when using an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO) on energy consumption in people with spinal cord injury: preliminary results.

M Arazpour, M J Hojjati, M Samadian, M Bahramizadeh, M Ahmadi Bani, S W Hutchins

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M ArazpourDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Tehran, Iran.
M J HojjatiDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Tehran, Iran.
M SamadianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.
M BahramizadehDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Tehran, Iran.
M Ahmadi BaniDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Tehran, Iran.
S W HutchinsFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of Salford , Salford, UK.
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of walking with isocentric reciprocating gait orthoses (IRGOs) utilizing two designs of ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) on specific outcome measures in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsFour volunteer SCI subjects participated in this study, and were fitted with an IRGO equipped with either solid or dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs in a randomized order. Subjects walked at their self-selected speed along a flat walkway to enable a comparison of walking speed, endurance and the resulting physiological cost index (PCI) to be performed.

resultsIncreased walking speed, increased distance walked and less PCI were demonstrated in walking with the IRGO incorporating dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs as compared to walking with an IRGO plus solid AFO as a control condition.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that people with SCI could walk at relatively higher speeds and with greater endurance and a reduced PCI when utilizing an IRGO with dorsiflexion-assisted AFO components compared to solid ones. It is therefore concluded that the IRGO incorporating dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs may be an effective alternative in helping to reduce the energy consumption experienced by people with SCI.

Indexed as

Health careTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID28053720
PMCPMC5129410
OpenAlexW2702322842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.