ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2015
Respiratory muscle training may improve respiratory function and obstructive sleep apnoea in people with cervical spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The effects of threshold inspiratory muscle training in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized experimental study.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020Trial
- Impact of respiratory muscle training on sleep disordered breathing in people with tetraplegia: a sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Spinal cord · 2026Article
- Article
- A Review of Different Stimulation Methods for Functional Reconstruction and Comparison of Respiratory Function after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum for2016
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis is a double-blind crossover case study series.
objectivesThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of respiratory muscle training (RMT) as an effective intervention to improve lung function and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients.
settingThis study was conducted in Australia.
methodsThree adults (C5-6, AIS A-C) participated in this study. They trained with an RMT device (active or sham) for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest, and then trained with the alternate device for 4 weeks. RMT occurred twice daily, 5 days a week, and it consisted of three sets of 12 inspirations and three sets of 12 expirations. Training intensity commenced at 30% maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and 30% maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), which was increased every second day by 10%. Spirometry, MIP, MEP, polysomnography and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were measured before and after every 4 weeks of training.
resultsAfter active RMT, vital capacity and inspiratory capacity improved from baseline in all participants (by 44%, 60% and 18% and by 18%, 46% and 5%, respectively); MIP improved by 40 and 17% from baseline in two subjects; and MEP improved in all participants. Two participants had OSA, and after active training their obstructive apnoea-hypopnoea index improved from 30 to 21events per hour and from 72 to 18 events per hour, and ESS marginally improved. Sham RMT resulted in minimal changes in all measures.
conclusionRMT is feasible and likely effective to increase respiratory muscle strength, to improve lung function, and to reduce the severity of OSA and sleepiness in people with cervical SCI. A randomised controlled trial is planned to validate these findings and to examine respiratory-related morbidity and quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.