Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053647›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2017

The plant leaf movement analyzer (PALMA): a simple tool for the analysis of periodic cotyledon and leaf movement in

Lucas Wagner, Christoph Schmal, Dorothee Staiger, Selahattin Danisman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive mapping of abiotic stress inputs into the soybean circadian clock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas WagnerMolecular Cell Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christoph SchmalMolecular Cell Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Institute for Theoretical Biology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Dorothee StaigerMolecular Cell Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Selahattin DanismanMolecular Cell Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-3781
Bielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analysis of circadian leaf movement rhythms is a simple yet effective method to study effects of treatments or gene mutations on the circadian clock of plants. Currently, leaf movements are analysed using time lapse photography and subsequent bioinformatics analyses of leaf movements. Programs that are used for this purpose either are able to perform one function (i.e. leaf tip detection or rhythm analysis) or their function is limited to specific computational environments. We developed a leaf movement analysis tool-PALMA-that works in command line and combines image extraction with rhythm analysis using Fast Fourier transformation and non-linear least squares fitting.

resultsWe validated PALMA in both simulated time series and in experiments using the known short period mutant

conclusionsPALMA correctly estimated the period of both simulated and real-life leaf movement experiments. As a platform-independent console-program that unites both functions needed for the analysis of circadian leaf movements it is a valid alternative to existing leaf movement analysis tools.

Indexed as

Circadian clockIron homeostasisPALMARhythmic cotyledon movement analysisRhythmic leaf movement analysis

Identifiers

PMID28053647
PMCPMC5209843
OpenAlexW2567234992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.