Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053522›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine

Do nanoparticles provide a new opportunity for diagnosis of distal airspace disease?

Jakob Löndahl, Jonas Kf Jakobsson, David M Broday, H Laura Aaltonen, Per Wollmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jakob LöndahlDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology (EAT), Department of Design Sciences; NanoLund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas Kf JakobssonDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology (EAT), Department of Design Sciences; NanoLund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
David M BrodayFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
H Laura AaltonenDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Per WollmerDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SETechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for efficient techniques to assess abnormalities in the peripheral regions of the lungs, for example, for diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema. Considerable scientific efforts have been directed toward measuring lung morphology by studying recovery of inhaled micron-sized aerosol particles (0.4-1.5 µm). In contrast, it is suggested that the recovery of inhaled airborne nanoparticles may be more useful for diagnosis. The objective of this work is to provide a theoretical background for the use of nanoparticles in measuring lung morphology and to assess their applicability based on a review of the literature. Using nanoparticles for studying distal airspace dimensions is shown to have several advantages over other aerosol-based methods. 1) Nanoparticles deposit almost exclusively by diffusion, which allows a simpler breathing maneuver with minor artifacts from particle losses in the oropharyngeal and upper airways. 2) A higher breathing flow rate can be utilized, making it possible to rapidly inhale from residual volume to total lung capacity (TLC), thereby eliminating the need to determine the TLC before measurement. 3) Recent studies indicate better penetration of nanoparticles than micron-sized particles into poorly ventilated and diseased regions of the lungs; thus, a stronger signal from the abnormal parts is expected. 4) Changes in airspace dimensions have a larger impact on the recovery of nanoparticles. Compared to current diagnostic techniques with high specificity for morphometric changes of the lungs, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized gases, an aerosol-based method is likely to be less time consuming, considerably cheaper, simpler to use, and easier to interpret (providing a single value rather than an image that has to be analyzed). Compared to diagnosis by carbon monoxide (

Indexed as

Diagnostic Uses of ChemicalsNanoparticlesAdministration, InhalationAerosolsDiffusionHumansLungLung Volume MeasurementsMagnetic Resonance ImagingParticle SizePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespirationSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAerosolsDiagnostic Uses of ChemicalsAiDACOPDemphysemalung particle interactionnanoaerosolsrespiratory diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID28053522
PMCPMC5191892
OpenAlexW2564556385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.