ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine
Do nanoparticles provide a new opportunity for diagnosis of distal airspace disease?
Article in International journal of nanomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aerosol deposition in the lung as a biomarker in asthma and chronic obstruction.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Activation of regenerative pathways by exercise intervention in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a study protocol.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Patient-specific estimation of distal lung morphometry using aerosol deposition data.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Enlarged airspaces in the distal lung in adolescents born very preterm as measured by aerosol.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- An experimental study on lung deposition of inhaled 2 μm particles in relation to lung characteristics and deposition models.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2023Article
- Airspace Dimension Assessment for early detection of lung function impairment in the peripheral airways of firefighters.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Airspace Dimension Assessment with Nanoparticles (AiDA) in Comparison to Established Pulmonary Function Tests.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Airspace dimension assessment with nanoparticles as a proposed biomarker for emphysema.Thorax · 2021Article
- Airspace Dimension Assessment (AiDA) by inhaled nanoparticles: benchmarking with hyperpolarisedScientific reports · 2021Article
- Altered deposition of inhaled nanoparticles in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2018Article
- Airspace Dimension Assessment with nanoparticles reflects lung density as quantified by MRI.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Article
- Pulmonary aerosol delivery and the importance of growth dynamics.Therapeutic delivery · 2017Article
- New perspectives in nanotherapeutics for chronic respiratory diseases.Biophysical reviews · 2017Article
- A new method for measuring lung deposition efficiency of airborne nanoparticles in a single breath.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for efficient techniques to assess abnormalities in the peripheral regions of the lungs, for example, for diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema. Considerable scientific efforts have been directed toward measuring lung morphology by studying recovery of inhaled micron-sized aerosol particles (0.4-1.5 µm). In contrast, it is suggested that the recovery of inhaled airborne nanoparticles may be more useful for diagnosis. The objective of this work is to provide a theoretical background for the use of nanoparticles in measuring lung morphology and to assess their applicability based on a review of the literature. Using nanoparticles for studying distal airspace dimensions is shown to have several advantages over other aerosol-based methods. 1) Nanoparticles deposit almost exclusively by diffusion, which allows a simpler breathing maneuver with minor artifacts from particle losses in the oropharyngeal and upper airways. 2) A higher breathing flow rate can be utilized, making it possible to rapidly inhale from residual volume to total lung capacity (TLC), thereby eliminating the need to determine the TLC before measurement. 3) Recent studies indicate better penetration of nanoparticles than micron-sized particles into poorly ventilated and diseased regions of the lungs; thus, a stronger signal from the abnormal parts is expected. 4) Changes in airspace dimensions have a larger impact on the recovery of nanoparticles. Compared to current diagnostic techniques with high specificity for morphometric changes of the lungs, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized gases, an aerosol-based method is likely to be less time consuming, considerably cheaper, simpler to use, and easier to interpret (providing a single value rather than an image that has to be analyzed). Compared to diagnosis by carbon monoxide (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.