ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017
The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03804047 (KITAMS), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
KITAMS: Kinesio Tape and Physical Function in Persons With Multiples Sclerosis
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a self-management educational program among people with multiple sclerosis: a pre-test post-test intervention study.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2026Article
- Patient SAtisfaction with the TYSabri SC Formulation - A Swiss multi-centriC, prospective non-intervenTIONal study: the SATYSFACTION study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Association of Physician-Patient Communication and Treatment Satisfaction with Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies Among Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2024Review
- Treatment Satisfaction with Teriflunomide in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Review
- Preferences, Adherence, and Satisfaction: Three Years of Treatment Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review].Neurology and therapy · 2023Review
- Treatment Patterns and Unmet Need for Patients with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Survey Results from 2016 to 2021.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Challenges of patients with multiple sclerosis in receiving health care services in Iran.Current journal of neurology · 2023Article
- A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies.Neurology and therapy · 2022Review
- Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Large-scale cross-sectional online survey on patient-neurologist communication, burden of disease assessment and disease monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Treatment Challenges in Multiple Sclerosis - A Continued Role for Glatiramer Acetate?Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- The need for a strategic therapeutic approach: multiple sclerosis in check.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Review
- Experiences of healthcare for people living with multiple sclerosis and their healthcare professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Patients experiences with multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies in daily life - a qualitative interview study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Approach to Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Addressing Invisible Symptoms-A Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2021Review
- Patient and Provider Insights into the Impact of Multiple Sclerosis on Mental Health: A Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManaging multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment presents challenges for both patients and health care professionals. Effective communication between patients with MS and their neurologist is important for improving clinical outcomes and quality of life.
methodsA closed-ended online market research survey was used to assess the current state of MS care from the perspective of both patients with MS (≥18 years of age) and neurologists who treat MS from Europe and the US and to gain insight into perceptions of treatment expectations/goals, treatment decisions, treatment challenges, communication, and satisfaction with care, based on current clinical practice.
resultsA total of 900 neurologists and 982 patients completed the survey, of whom 46% self-identified as having remitting-relapsing MS, 29% secondary progressive MS, and 11% primary progressive MS. Overall, patients felt satisfied with their disease-modifying therapy (DMT); satisfaction related to comfort in speaking with their neurologist and participation in their DMT decision-making process. Patients who self-identified as having relapsing-remitting MS were more likely to be very satisfied with their treatment. Top challenges identified by patients in managing their DMT were cost, side effects/tolerability of treatment, and uncertainty if treatment was working. Half of the patients reported skipping doses, but only 68% told their health care provider that they did so.
conclusionSeveral important differences in perception were identified between patients and neurologists concerning treatment selection, satisfaction, expectations, goals, and comfort discussing symptoms, as well as treatment challenges and skipped doses. The study results emphasize that patient/neurologist communication and patient input into the treatment decision-making process likely influence patient satisfaction with treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.