Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053326›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2017

Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.

Russell A Poldrack, Chris I Baker, Joke Durnez, Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Paul M Matthews, Marcus R Munafò, Thomas E Nichols, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Edward Vul, Tal Yarkoni

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 732 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
732citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled343ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking, CigaretteArmsTobacco retailer, Non-tobacco retailer
NCT05444907 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Deep Brain Stimulation-induced Mania: Finding Potential Predictors to Optimize Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorAlbino MaiaRan2021 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsMania, Parkinson DiseaseArmsNo Intervention / Exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

732 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The neuroanatomy of depression: weak but replicable effects in 4021 individuals from three clinical cohorts.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

672 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Chris I BakerLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, US National Institutes of Health, Maryland 20892, USA.
Joke DurnezDepartment of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Krzysztof J GorgolewskiDepartment of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Paul M MatthewsDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK.
Marcus R MunafòMedical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1BN, UK.
Thomas E NicholsDepartment of Statistics and WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Jean-Baptiste PolineHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Henry H. Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center, University of California, 132 Barker Hall 210S, Berkeley, California 94720-3192, USA.
Edward VulDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92093, USA.
Tal YarkoniDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
SOLAR-Eclipse Computational Tools for Imaging GeneticsR01EB015611 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2012 to 2024
$5.0M
Bayesian Spatial Point Process Modeling of Neuroimage DataR01NS075066 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002909Medical Research Council G9409634Medical Research Council MC_PC_17114Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MR/M024903/1Medical Research Council MR/N026934/1NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015611NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075066Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging techniques have transformed our ability to probe the neurobiological basis of behaviour and are increasingly being applied by the wider neuroscience community. However, concerns have recently been raised that the conclusions that are drawn from some human neuroimaging studies are either spurious or not generalizable. Problems such as low statistical power, flexibility in data analysis, software errors and a lack of direct replication apply to many fields, but perhaps particularly to functional MRI. Here, we discuss these problems, outline current and suggested best practices, and describe how we think the field should evolve to produce the most meaningful and reliable answers to neuroscientific questions.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPractice Guidelines as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28053326
PMCPMC6910649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.