Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053241›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2017

Comparative biology of pain: What invertebrates can tell us about how nociception works.

Brian D Burrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Starvation transforms signal encoding inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The paraEuropean journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Defending and refining the BirchAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Multiple mechanisms of action of an extremely painful venom.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. I Feel! Therefore, I Am from Pain to Consciousness in DOC Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brian D BurrellDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota bburrell@usd.edu.

Funding

VIRAL-MEDIATED RNA INTERFERENCE IN THE ADULT RAT BRAINP20RR015567 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI EYSTER, KATHLEEN M · 2000 to 2009
$16.3M
Endovanilloid-Mediated Modulation and its Role in Habituation and SensitizationR01NS092716 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI BURRELL, BRIAN DONALD · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015567NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inability to adequately treat chronic pain is a worldwide health care crisis. Pain has both an emotional and a sensory component, and this latter component, nociception, refers specifically to the detection of damaging or potentially damaging stimuli. Nociception represents a critical interaction between an animal and its environment and exhibits considerable evolutionary conservation across species. Using comparative approaches to understand the basic biology of nociception could promote the development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat pain, and studies of nociception in invertebrates can provide especially useful insights toward this goal. Both vertebrates and invertebrates exhibit segregated sensory pathways for nociceptive and nonnociceptive information, injury-induced sensitization to nociceptive and nonnociceptive stimuli, and even similar antinociceptive modulatory processes. In a number of invertebrate species, the central nervous system is understood in considerable detail, and it is often possible to record from and/or manipulate single identifiable neurons through either molecular genetic or physiological approaches. Invertebrates also provide an opportunity to study nociception in an ethologically relevant context that can provide novel insights into the nature of how injury-inducing stimuli produce persistent changes in behavior. Despite these advantages, invertebrates have been underutilized in nociception research. In this review, findings from invertebrate nociception studies are summarized, and proposals for how research using invertebrates can address questions about the fundamental mechanisms of nociception are presented.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionInvertebratesPainAnimalsHumansNociceptionendocannabinoidethologyneuromodulationpainsynapse

Identifiers

PMID28053241
PMCPMC5376606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.