Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053076›Full record

ArticleILAR journal2016

Opportunities to Apply the 3Rs in Safety Assessment Programs.

Fiona Sewell, Joanna Edwards, Helen Prior, Sally Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ILAR journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona SewellFiona Sewell, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Toxicology and Regulatory Sciences at the UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK. Joanna Edwards, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Technology Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Helen Prior, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Drug Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Sally Robinson, PhD, is Head of Laboratory Animal Sciences at AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.
Joanna EdwardsFiona Sewell, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Toxicology and Regulatory Sciences at the UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK. Joanna Edwards, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Technology Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Helen Prior, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Drug Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Sally Robinson, PhD, is Head of Laboratory Animal Sciences at AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.
Helen PriorFiona Sewell, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Toxicology and Regulatory Sciences at the UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK. Joanna Edwards, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Technology Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Helen Prior, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Drug Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Sally Robinson, PhD, is Head of Laboratory Animal Sciences at AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.
Sally RobinsonFiona Sewell, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Toxicology and Regulatory Sciences at the UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK. Joanna Edwards, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Technology Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Helen Prior, PhD, is a Programme Manager in Drug Development at the NC3Rs, London, UK. Sally Robinson, PhD, is Head of Laboratory Animal Sciences at AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before a potential new medicine can be administered to humans it is essential that its safety is adequately assessed. Safety assessment in animals forms an integral part of this process, from early drug discovery and initial candidate selection to the program of recommended regulatory tests in animals. The 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement of animals in research) are integrated in the current regulatory requirements and expectations and, in the EU, provide a legal and ethical framework for in vivo research to ensure the scientific objectives are met whilst minimizing animal use and maintaining high animal welfare standards. Though the regulations are designed to uncover potential risks, they are intended to be flexible, so that the most appropriate approach can be taken for an individual product. This article outlines current and future opportunities to apply the 3Rs in safety assessment programs for pharmaceuticals, and the potential (scientific, financial, and ethical) benefits to the industry, across the drug discovery and development process. For example, improvements to, or the development of, novel, early screens (e.g., in vitro, in silico, or nonmammalian screens) designed to identify compounds with undesirable characteristics earlier in development have the potential to reduce late-stage attrition by improving the selection of compounds that require regulatory testing in animals. Opportunities also exist within the current regulatory framework to simultaneously reduce and/or refine animal use and improve scientific outcomes through improvements to technical procedures and/or adjustments to study designs. It is important that approaches to safety assessment are continuously reviewed and challenged to ensure they are science-driven and predictive of relevant effects in humans.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesDrug DiscoveryAnimalsAnimal WelfareHumans3Rsdrug developmentpharmaceuticals, safety assessmentreductionrefinementreplacement

Identifiers

PMID28053076
PMCPMC5886346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.