Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053071›Full record

ArticleILAR journal2016

Mouse Models for Drug Discovery. Can New Tools and Technology Improve Translational Power?

Aamir Zuberi, Cathleen Lutz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ILAR journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Improved structure of mouse gasdermin D: a new blueprint for structure-based drug design.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Microphysiological systems: What it takes for community adoption.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aamir ZuberiCathleen Lutz holds a PhD in biochemistry and an MBA and is the director of the Mouse Repository at The Jackson Laboratory as well as the director of the Rare and Orphan Disease Center and the lead for the in vivo pharmacology program at The Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine. Aamir Zuberi holds a PhD in molecular genetics and is a research associate in the laboratory of Dr. Lutz at the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
Cathleen LutzCathleen Lutz holds a PhD in biochemistry and an MBA and is the director of the Mouse Repository at The Jackson Laboratory as well as the director of the Rare and Orphan Disease Center and the lead for the in vivo pharmacology program at The Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine. Aamir Zuberi holds a PhD in molecular genetics and is a research associate in the laboratory of Dr. Lutz at the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
Jackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Use for ResourceP40OD011102 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Stephen A Murray · 2012 to 2026
$15.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of mouse models in biomedical research and preclinical drug evaluation is on the rise. The advent of new molecular genome-altering technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 allows for genetic mutations to be introduced into the germ line of a mouse faster and less expensively than previous methods. In addition, the rapid progress in the development and use of somatic transgenesis using viral vectors, as well as manipulations of gene expression with siRNAs and antisense oligonucleotides, allow for even greater exploration into genomics and systems biology. These technological advances come at a time when cost reductions in genome sequencing have led to the identification of pathogenic mutations in patient populations, providing unprecedented opportunities in the use of mice to model human disease. The ease of genetic engineering in mice also offers a potential paradigm shift in resource sharing and the speed by which models are made available in the public domain. Predictively, the knowledge alone that a model can be quickly remade will provide relief to resources encumbered by licensing and Material Transfer Agreements. For decades, mouse strains have provided an exquisite experimental tool to study the pathophysiology of the disease and assess therapeutic options in a genetically defined system. However, a major limitation of the mouse has been the limited genetic diversity associated with common laboratory mice. This has been overcome with the recent development of the Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred mice. These strains provide new tools capable of replicating genetic diversity to that approaching the diversity found in human populations. The Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred strains thus provide a means to observe and characterize toxicity or efficacy of new therapeutic drugs for a given population. The combination of traditional and contemporary mouse genome editing tools, along with the addition of genetic diversity in new modeling systems, are synergistic and serve to make the mouse a better model for biomedical research, enhancing the potential for preclinical drug discovery and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesGenomeGenomicsHumansMiceMutationCRISPR/Cas9mousepreclinical

Identifiers

PMID28053071
PMCPMC5886322
OpenAlexW2568134927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.