ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017
A Spiking Working Memory Model Based on Hebbian Short-Term Potentiation.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence from multifeature whole-report in visual short-term memory suggests that not all misbinding is swapping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Short-term plasticity influences episodic memory recall: an interplay of synaptic traces in a spiking neural network model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Modeling visual working memory using recurrent on-center off-surround neural network with distance dependent inhibition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rhythmic circuit function is more robust to changes in synaptic than intrinsic conductances.eLife · 2025Article
- Level of M1 GABAB predicts micro offline consolidation of motor learning during wakefulness.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Article
- Promiscuous involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the storage ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- The importance of covert memory consolidation in schizophrenia: Dysfunctional network profiles of the hippocampus and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2024Article
- Representation and computation in visual working memory.Nature human behaviour · 2024Review
- Presynaptic Rac1 in the hippocampus selectively regulates working memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dynamic fading memory and expectancy effects in the monkey primary visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Spiking representation learning for associative memories.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Stochastic attractor models of visual working memory.PloS one · 2024Article
- Building a realistic, scalable memory model with independent engrams using a homeostatic mechanism.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Neurobiological Causal Models of Language Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- "Leader-Follower" Dynamic Perturbation Manipulates Multi-Item Working Memory in Humans.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Article
- Rapid astrocyte-dependent facilitation amplifies multi-vesicular release in hippocampal synapses.Cell reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dominant theory of working memory (WM), referred to as the persistent activity hypothesis, holds that recurrently connected neural networks, presumably located in the prefrontal cortex, encode and maintain WM memory items through sustained elevated activity. Reexamination of experimental data has shown that prefrontal cortex activity in single units during delay periods is much more variable than predicted by such a theory and associated computational models. Alternative models of WM maintenance based on synaptic plasticity, such as short-term nonassociative (non-Hebbian) synaptic facilitation, have been suggested but cannot account for encoding of novel associations. Here we test the hypothesis that a recently identified fast-expressing form of Hebbian synaptic plasticity (associative short-term potentiation) is a possible mechanism for WM encoding and maintenance. Our simulations using a spiking neural network model of cortex reproduce a range of cognitive memory effects in the classical multi-item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of word lists. Memory reactivation in the model occurs in discrete oscillatory bursts rather than as sustained activity. We relate dynamic network activity as well as key synaptic characteristics to electrophysiological measurements. Our findings support the hypothesis that fast Hebbian short-term potentiation is a key WM mechanism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition. Hypotheses about the neural mechanism behind WM are currently under revision. Reflecting recent findings of fast Hebbian synaptic plasticity in cortex, we test whether a cortical spiking neural network model with such a mechanism can learn a multi-item WM task (word list learning). We show that our model can reproduce human cognitive phenomena and achieve comparable memory performance in both free and cued recall while being simultaneously compatible with experimental data on structure, connectivity, and neurophysiology of the underlying cortical tissue. These findings are directly relevant to the ongoing paradigm shift in the WM field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.