Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28053032›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

A Spiking Working Memory Model Based on Hebbian Short-Term Potentiation.

Florian Fiebig, Anders Lansner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Promiscuous involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the storage ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Presynaptic Rac1 in the hippocampus selectively regulates working memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Dynamic fading memory and expectancy effects in the monkey primary visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurobiological Causal Models of Language Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian FiebigLansner Laboratory, Department of Computational Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-8562
Anders LansnerLansner Laboratory, Department of Computational Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden, ala@kth.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-7815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dominant theory of working memory (WM), referred to as the persistent activity hypothesis, holds that recurrently connected neural networks, presumably located in the prefrontal cortex, encode and maintain WM memory items through sustained elevated activity. Reexamination of experimental data has shown that prefrontal cortex activity in single units during delay periods is much more variable than predicted by such a theory and associated computational models. Alternative models of WM maintenance based on synaptic plasticity, such as short-term nonassociative (non-Hebbian) synaptic facilitation, have been suggested but cannot account for encoding of novel associations. Here we test the hypothesis that a recently identified fast-expressing form of Hebbian synaptic plasticity (associative short-term potentiation) is a possible mechanism for WM encoding and maintenance. Our simulations using a spiking neural network model of cortex reproduce a range of cognitive memory effects in the classical multi-item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of word lists. Memory reactivation in the model occurs in discrete oscillatory bursts rather than as sustained activity. We relate dynamic network activity as well as key synaptic characteristics to electrophysiological measurements. Our findings support the hypothesis that fast Hebbian short-term potentiation is a key WM mechanism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition. Hypotheses about the neural mechanism behind WM are currently under revision. Reflecting recent findings of fast Hebbian synaptic plasticity in cortex, we test whether a cortical spiking neural network model with such a mechanism can learn a multi-item WM task (word list learning). We show that our model can reproduce human cognitive phenomena and achieve comparable memory performance in both free and cued recall while being simultaneously compatible with experimental data on structure, connectivity, and neurophysiology of the underlying cortical tissue. These findings are directly relevant to the ongoing paradigm shift in the WM field.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalComputer SimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansMemory, Short-TermMental RecallNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal CellsVerbal LearningHebbian plasticityprimacyrecencyshort-term potentiationword list learningworking memory

Identifiers

PMID28053032
PMCPMC5214637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.