Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052981›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2017

Variation in Functional Status After Hip Fracture: Facility and Regional Influence on Mobility and Self-Care.

Srinivas Teppala, Kenneth J Ottenbacher, Karl Eschbach, Amit Kumar, Soham Al Snih, Winston J Chan, Timothy A Reistetter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Srinivas TeppalaHealth Service Consultant, Visakhapatnam, India.
Kenneth J OttenbacherDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences.
Karl EschbachDepartment of Internal Medicine & Geriatrics.
Amit KumarDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences.
Soham Al SnihDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences.
Winston J ChanOffice of Biostatistics.
Timothy A ReistetterDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
Center for Rehabilitation Research Using Large DatasetsR24HD065702 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2010 to 2014
$4.0M
Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service AreasR01HS024711 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI REISTETTER, TIMOTHY · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Hospital Readmission and Inpatient Medical RehabilitationR01HD069443 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2012 to 2015
$927k
Regional Variability in Inpatient Rehabilitation among Medicare BeneficiariesK01HD068513 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI REISTETTER, TIMOTHY · 2011 to 2014
$438k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024711AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD068513NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069443NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD065702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reports show substantial geographic variation in postacute health care spending. Little is known about variation in functional outcomes after postacute rehabilitation for patients with hip fracture. We examined variation in mobility and self-care after hip fracture rehabilitation across inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), hospital referral regions (HRRs) and states.

methodsRetrospective cohort study using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from 2006 to 2009. Study sample included 149,258 records from patients 66 years and older at 1,166 IRFs located within 292 HRRs and across 50 states. Hip fracture cases were defined by CMS impairment group codes (08.11, 08.12). Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to assess discharge mobility and self-care functional status, adjusting for individual patient characteristics and the random effect of IRFs, HRRs, and states.

resultsVariation in discharge mobility status as assessed by the intraclass correlation percentage (ICC%) was 8.8% across IRFs, 4.0% across HRRs, and 1.8% across states. For self-care, the ICCs were 10.2% across IRFs, 4.8% across HRRs, and 2.4% across states. The range of discharge mobility scores (maximum functional status rating to minimum functional status rating) showed a 9.6-point difference for IRFs, 6.5 for regions, and 2.6 for states. Range of discharge self-care scores were 13.1 for IRFs, 6.8 for HRRs, and 3.4 for states.

conclusionVariation in functional status following postacute hip fracture rehabilitation appears to occur primarily at the level of facilities rather than geographic location.

Indexed as

Self CareAgedFemaleHip FracturesHumansLength of StayMaleMedicarePatient DischargeRecovery of FunctionRehabilitation CentersRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesFunctional statusHip fracturePostacuteQuality of careRehabilitationVariation

Identifiers

PMID28052981
PMCPMC5861914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.