Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052933›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Grilled, Barbecued, and Smoked Meat Intake and Survival Following Breast Cancer.

Humberto Parada, Susan E Steck, Patrick T Bradshaw, Lawrence S Engel, Kathleen Conway, Susan L Teitelbaum, Alfred I Neugut, Regina M Santella, Marilie D Gammon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dietary Advanced Glycation End-Products and Mortality after Breast Cancer in the Women's Health Initiative.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antitumour Property ofBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Self-reported residential pesticide use and survival after breast cancer.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Humberto ParadaAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Susan E SteckAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Patrick T BradshawAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Lawrence S EngelAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Kathleen ConwayAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Susan L TeitelbaumAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Alfred I NeugutAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Regina M SantellaAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Marilie D GammonAffiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (HPJr, LSE, KC, MDG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SES); Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (PTB); Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SLT); Department of Epidemiology (AIN), Department of Medicine (AIN), and Department of Environmental Health (RMS), Columbia University, New York, NY.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Robert O Wright · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
LINEBERGER CANCER CONTROL EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EARP, JO ANNE L, RIBISL, KURT M. · 1992 to 2016
$8.0M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
BREAST CANCER AND THE ENVIRONMENT ON LONG ISLANDU01CA066572 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GAMMON, MARILIE D · 1995 to 2004
$1.7M
Gene-Nutrient Interactions and Breast CancerK07CA102640 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI STECK, SUSAN E · 2003 to 2007
$621k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA102640NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057726NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS U01 CA066572NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Grilled, barbecued, and smoked meat intake, a prevalent dietary source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) carcinogens, may increase the risk of incident breast cancer. However, no studies have examined whether intake of this PAH source influences survival after breast cancer. Methods: We interviewed a population-based cohort of 1508 women diagnosed with first primary invasive or in situ breast cancer in 1996 and 1997 at baseline and again approximately five years later to assess grilled/barbecued and smoked meat intake. After a median of 17.6 years of follow-up, 597 deaths, of which 237 were breast cancer related, were identified. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality as related to prediagnosis intake, comparing high (above the median) to low intake, as well as postdiagnosis changes in intake, comparing every combination of pre-/postdiagnosis intake to low pre-/postdiagnosis intake. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: High prediagnosis grilled/barbecued and smoked meat intake was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.46). Other associations were noted, but estimates were not statistically significant. These include high prediagnosis smoked beef/lamb/pork intake and increased all-cause (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.38, P Conclusion: High intake of grilled/barbecued and smoked meat may increase mortality after breast cancer.

Indexed as

DietMeatAgedAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCattleCause of DeathCookingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNew YorkPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPoultrySeafoodPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID28052933
PMCPMC5214623
OpenAlexW2569244998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.