Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052849›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in Nonobese, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Critically Ill Patients.

Abdulaziz S Alobaid, Steven C Wallis, Paul Jarrett, Therese Starr, Janine Stuart, Melissa Lassig-Smith, Jenny Lisette Ordóñez Mejia, Michael S Roberts, Claire Roger, Andrew A Udy and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of High-Dose Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Obese Patients.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdulaziz S AlobaidBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Steven C WallisBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Paul JarrettRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Therese StarrRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Janine StuartRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Melissa Lassig-SmithRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jenny Lisette Ordóñez MejiaBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michael S RobertsTherapeutics Research Centre, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Claire RogerBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew A UdyDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Prahran, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jason A RobertsBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUUniversité de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of infections in critically ill obese and morbidly obese patients is challenging because of the combined physiological changes that result from obesity and critical illness. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in a cohort of critically ill patients, including obese and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese. Plasma samples were collected, and piperacillin concentrations were determined by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics software. Thirty-seven critically ill patients (including 12 obese patients and 12 morbidly obese patients) were enrolled. The patients' mean ± standard deviation age, weight, and BMI were 50 ± 15 years, 104 ± 35 kg, and 38.0 ± 15.0 kg/m

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiological AvailabilityBody Mass IndexCreatinineCritical IllnessDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLinear ModelsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatininePenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combinationantibioticscreatinine clearancedosingmorbid obesitypharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28052849
PMCPMC5328553
OpenAlexW2571552493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.