Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052843›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior.

Daniel M Walker, Tyler Johnson, Eric W Ford, Timothy R Huerta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public comfort with the use of ChatGPT and expectations for healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Applying anti-racist approaches to informatics: a new lens on traditional frames.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sociodemographic Differences and Factors Affecting Patient Portal Utilization.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Privacy of electronic health records: a review of the literature.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel M WalkerDepartment of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5434-3162
Tyler JohnsonDepartment of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8746-9706
Eric W FordDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7885-0019
Timothy R HuertaDepartment of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-3564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs electronic health records (EHRs) become ubiquitous in the health care industry, privacy breaches are increasing and being made public. These breaches may make consumers wary of the technology, undermining its potential to improve care coordination and research.

objectiveGiven the developing concerns around privacy of personal health information stored in digital format, it is important for providers to understand how views on privacy and security may be associated with patient disclosure of health information. This study aimed to understand how privacy concerns may be shifting patient behavior.

methodsUsing a pooled cross-section of data from the 2011 and 2014 cycles of the Health Information and National Trends Survey (HINTS), we tested whether privacy and security concerns, as well as quality perceptions, are associated with the likelihood of withholding personal health information from a provider. A fully interacted multivariate model was used to compare associations between the 2 years, and interaction terms were used to evaluate trends in the factors that are associated with withholding behavior.

resultsNo difference was found regarding the effect of privacy and security concerns on withholding behavior between 2011 and 2014. Similarly, whereas perceived high quality of care was found to reduce the likelihood of withholding information from a provider in both 2011 (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.94) and 2014 (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.76), no difference was observed between years.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that consumers' beliefs about EHR privacy and security, the relationship between technology use and quality, and intentions to share information with their health care provider have not changed. These findings are counter to the ongoing discussions about the implications of security failures in other domains. Our results suggest that providers could ameliorate privacy and security by focusing on the care quality benefits EHRs provide.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsTrustAdolescentAdultAgedConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureFemaleHealth Records, PersonalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrivacyQuality of Health CareYoung Adultdisclosureelectronic health recordselectronic medical recordspersonal health informationprivacytrust

Identifiers

PMID28052843
PMCPMC5244032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.