Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2017
The burden of major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of complete versus culprit-only revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular event in diverse subpopulations.Future cardiology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk of cardiovascular outcomes with bempedoic acid in high-risk statin intolerant patients: a systematic review and meta analysis.Future cardiology · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Health Interventions in Patient Management Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid profile and prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and pre-frailty or frailty status.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Trial
- Article
- Evaluation of neutrophil oxidative burst capacity in relation to major adverse cardiac events and infection in patients with cardiovascular disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Magnetocardiography for Exploratory Risk Stratification in Patients With Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Intravenous Atropine in Reducing Reperfusion Arrhythmias, Conduction Abnormalities, and Hypotension in Inferior ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
- Nursing interventions' impact on cardiovascular complications after gastrointestinal surgery in intensive care unit: Risk factor analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the True Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Is Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring with Treatment the Right Approach?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- The role of chest pain symptoms in predicting coronary artery disease severity and MACE events in patients with zero CAC: a study from a large CCTA cohort.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning can predict cardiovascular events from liver imaging.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of the Tpe/Qtc ratio in predicting major adverse cardiac events in acute STEMI patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between late sleeping and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Assessing the Suitability of CHABiomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with a history of cardiovascular disease are at high risk of developing secondary major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This study aimed to identify independent predictors of MACE after hospital admission which could be used to identify of high-risk patients who may benefit from preventive strategies.
methodsThis study included 1,520 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (654 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 866 with elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients) who received PCI and/or stenting. MACE was defined as all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for a cardiovascular- related illness. Cardiovascular-related illnesses included heart failure, reinfarction (nonfatal), recurrence of angina pectoris and repeat PCI or coronary artery bypass graft.
resultsDuring a mean follow-up period of 32 months, 558 of the 1,520 patients developed at least one MACE. Cox regression analysis showed that the baseline clinical and biochemical variables which associated with MACE were age, being illiterate, a widow or widower, and/or economically dependent, having triple vessel disease, stent implantation, anemia, and/or diabetes mellitus, waist to hip ratio (WHR), diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular-hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in ACS patients, and age, malnourished, and/or economically dependent, taking hypoglycemic medication, having triple vessel disease, stent implantation, anemia, diabetes mellitus, and/or hypertension, WHR, fasting glucose, HDL-C, uric acid, creatinine, eGFR, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, mean corpuscular volume, and MCHC in elective PCI patients. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found the MACE's independent factors are triple vessel disease, stent implantation, hypertension, and eGFR in ACS patients, and having triple vessel disease, stent implantation, hypertension, and uric acid in elective PCI patients.
conclusionsHaving triple vessel disease, stent implantation, hypertension, and eGFR or uric acid independently predicted MACE in patients with CAD after long-term follow-up. Fortunately, these factors are modifiable and should be identified and monitored early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.