Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052576›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2017

Pre-operative oral nutritional supplementation with dietary advice versus dietary advice alone in weight-losing patients with colorectal cancer: single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Sorrel T Burden, Debra J Gibson, Simon Lal, James Hill, Mark Pilling, Mattias Soop, Aswatha Ramesh, Chris Todd

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03315195 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Postoperative Complication Between Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplement With Dietary Advice and Conventional Dietary Advice Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Major Gastrointestinal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03315195 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Postoperative Complication Between Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplement With Dietary Advice and Conventional Dietary Advice Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Major Gastrointestinal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled268ConditionsSurgery--Complications, Nutrition Aspect of CancerArmsOral nutritional supplement (ONS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Oral nutrition interventions in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer: A systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  14. Effect of Perioperative Nutritional Supplementation on Postoperative Complications-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sorrel T BurdenSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Debra J GibsonSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Simon LalSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
James HillCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Mark PillingSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mattias SoopSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Aswatha RameshUniversity Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, UK.
Chris ToddSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-operative weight loss has been consistently associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The study aims to determine if pre-operative oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) with dietary advice reduce post-operative complications.

methodsSingle-blinded randomized controlled trial. People with colorectal cancer scheduled for surgery with pre-operative weight loss >1 kg/3-6 months were randomized by using stratified blocks (1:1 ratio) in six hospitals (1 November 2013-28 February 2015). Intervention group was given 250 mL/day ONS (10.1 KJ and 0.096 g protein per mL) and dietary advice. Control group received dietary advice alone. Oral nutritional supplements were administered from diagnosis to the day preceding surgery. Research team was masked to group allocation. Primary outcome was patients with one or more surgical site infection (SSI) or chest infection; secondary outcomes included percentage weight loss, total complications, and body composition measurements. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. A sample size of 88 was required.

resultsOf 101 participants, (55 ONS, 46 controls) 97 had surgery. In intention-to-treat analysis, there were 21/45 (47%) patients with an infection-either an SSI or chest infection in the control group vs. 17/55 (30%) in the ONS group. The odds ratio of a patient incurring either an SSI or chest infection was 0.532 (P = 0.135 confidence interval 0.232 to 1.218) in the unadjusted analysis and when adjusted for random differences at baseline (age, gender, percentage weight loss, and cancer staging) was 0.341 (P = 0.031, confidence interval 0.128 to 0.909). Pre-operative percentage weight loss at the first time point after randomization was 4.1% [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7-7.0] in ONS group vs. 6.7% (IQR 2.6-10.8) in controls (Mann-Whitney U P = 0.021) and post-operatively was 7.4% (IQR 4.3-10.0) in ONS group vs. 10.2% (IQR 5.1-18.5) in controls (P = 0.016).

conclusionsCompared with dietary advice alone, ONS resulted in patients having fewer infections and less weight loss following surgery for colorectal cancer. We have demonstrated that pre-operative oral nutritional supplementation can improve clinical outcome in weight losing patients with colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

CounselingDietary SupplementsNutrition TherapyPreoperative CareWeight LossAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeCancerColorectalInfectionsRCTSupplementsWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID28052576
PMCPMC5476846
OpenAlexW2566968519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.