Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2017
Pre-operative oral nutritional supplementation with dietary advice versus dietary advice alone in weight-losing patients with colorectal cancer: single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03315195 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Postoperative Complication Between Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplement With Dietary Advice and Conventional Dietary Advice Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Major Gastrointestinal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Postoperative Complication Between Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplement With Dietary Advice and Conventional Dietary Advice Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Major Gastrointestinal Surgery
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Robust is the Evidence for Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Fragility Index Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The role of nutritional supplementation in preventing postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Access, acceptance and adherence to cancer prehabilitation: a mixed-methods systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Pooled it
- Association between sarcopenia and postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Prehabilitation in Major Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery: a Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Prehabilitation Modalities on Postoperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Preoperative nutrition therapy in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Nutrition as prevention for improved cancer health outcomes: a systematic literature review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Pooled it
- Nutritional Interventions to Improve Cachexia Outcomes in Cancer-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pre-admission interventions (prehabilitation) to improve outcome after major elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Oral nutrition interventions in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer: A systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of Perioperative Nutritional Supplementation on Postoperative Complications-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Preoperative Weight Loss in Patients With Excess Weight and Colorectal Cancer: The CARE Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Promoting postoperative recovery in older adult surgical patients: a randomized controlled trial of MDT-based perioperative comprehensive nutritional management model.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Pre-operative oral nutritional supplementation with dietary advice versus dietary advice alone in weight-losing patients with colorectal cancer: single-blind randomized controlled trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2017Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPre-operative weight loss has been consistently associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The study aims to determine if pre-operative oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) with dietary advice reduce post-operative complications.
methodsSingle-blinded randomized controlled trial. People with colorectal cancer scheduled for surgery with pre-operative weight loss >1 kg/3-6 months were randomized by using stratified blocks (1:1 ratio) in six hospitals (1 November 2013-28 February 2015). Intervention group was given 250 mL/day ONS (10.1 KJ and 0.096 g protein per mL) and dietary advice. Control group received dietary advice alone. Oral nutritional supplements were administered from diagnosis to the day preceding surgery. Research team was masked to group allocation. Primary outcome was patients with one or more surgical site infection (SSI) or chest infection; secondary outcomes included percentage weight loss, total complications, and body composition measurements. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. A sample size of 88 was required.
resultsOf 101 participants, (55 ONS, 46 controls) 97 had surgery. In intention-to-treat analysis, there were 21/45 (47%) patients with an infection-either an SSI or chest infection in the control group vs. 17/55 (30%) in the ONS group. The odds ratio of a patient incurring either an SSI or chest infection was 0.532 (P = 0.135 confidence interval 0.232 to 1.218) in the unadjusted analysis and when adjusted for random differences at baseline (age, gender, percentage weight loss, and cancer staging) was 0.341 (P = 0.031, confidence interval 0.128 to 0.909). Pre-operative percentage weight loss at the first time point after randomization was 4.1% [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7-7.0] in ONS group vs. 6.7% (IQR 2.6-10.8) in controls (Mann-Whitney U P = 0.021) and post-operatively was 7.4% (IQR 4.3-10.0) in ONS group vs. 10.2% (IQR 5.1-18.5) in controls (P = 0.016).
conclusionsCompared with dietary advice alone, ONS resulted in patients having fewer infections and less weight loss following surgery for colorectal cancer. We have demonstrated that pre-operative oral nutritional supplementation can improve clinical outcome in weight losing patients with colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.