Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052450›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Correspondence between evoked and intrinsic functional brain network configurations.

Taylor Bolt, Jason S Nomi, Mikail Rubinov, Lucina Q Uddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modular reconfiguration of an auditory control brain network supports adaptive listening behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor BoltDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-0533-3010
Jason S NomiDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Mikail RubinovDepartment of Psychiatry, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lucina Q UddinDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.

Funding

Cognitive and Neural Flexibility in AutismR01MH107549 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI UDDIN, LUCINA QAZI · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the literature exploring differences between intrinsic and task-evoked brain architectures has examined changes in functional connectivity patterns between specific brain regions. While informative, this approach overlooks important overall functional changes in hub organization and network topology that may provide insights about differences in integration between intrinsic and task-evoked states. Examination of changes in overall network organization, such as a change in the concentration of hub nodes or a quantitative change in network organization, is important for understanding the underlying processes that differ between intrinsic and task-evoked brain architectures. The present study used graph-theoretical techniques applied to publicly available neuroimaging data collected from a large sample of individuals (N = 202), and a within-subject design where resting-state and several task scans were collected from each participant as part of the Human Connectome Project. We demonstrate that differences between intrinsic and task-evoked brain networks are characterized by a task-general shift in high-connectivity hubs from primarily sensorimotor/auditory processing areas during the intrinsic state to executive control/salience network areas during task performance. In addition, we demonstrate that differences between intrinsic and task-evoked architectures are associated with changes in overall network organization, such as increases in network clustering, global efficiency and integration between modules. These findings offer a new perspective on the principles guiding functional brain organization by identifying unique and divergent properties of overall network organization between the resting-state and task performance. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1992-2007, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultBrainConnectomeEmotionsExecutive FunctionFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMotor ActivityNeural PathwaysOxygengraph theoryHuman Connectome Projectintrinsic connectivityresting state fMRIsalience network

Identifiers

PMID28052450
PMCPMC6866760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.