Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052113›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Zoonoses in Veterinary Students: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Antonio Sánchez, Miranda Prats-van der Ham, Juan Tatay-Dualde, Ana Paterna, Christian de la Fe, Ángel Gómez-Martín, Juan C Corrales, Antonio Contreras

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ControllingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Is there a higher risk of exposure toOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Review on the Prevalence ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio SánchezResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Miranda Prats-van der HamResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Juan Tatay-DualdeResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Ana PaternaResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Christian de la FeResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Ángel Gómez-MartínResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Juan C CorralesResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Antonio ContrerasResearch Group of Ruminant Health, Animal Health Department, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Murcia University, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeterinary students face diverse potential sources of zoonotic pathogens since the first years of their academic degree. Such sources include different animal species and pathologic materials which are used at university facilities as well as commercial clinics, farms and other external facilities.

objectivesThe present study utilizes a systematic review of the literature to identify zoonoses described in veterinary students. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science and PubMed.

resultsOf the 1,254 titles produced by the bibliographic search, 62 were included in this review. Whereas 28 of these articles (45.2%) described individual cases or outbreaks, the remaining 34 (54.8%) reported serological results. The zoonotic etiological agents described were bacteria, in 39 studies (62.9%), parasites, in 12 works (19.4%), virus, in 9 studies (14.5%) and fungi, in 2 (3.2%) of the selected articles. The selected literature included references from 24 different countries and covered the time period of the last 55 years. LIMITATIONS: The fact that common cases of disease or cases of little clinical importance without collective repercussions are not usually published in peer-reviewed journals limits the possibility to reach conclusions from a quantitative point of view. Furthermore, most of the selected works (66.1%) refer to European or North American countries, and thus, the number of cases due to pathogens which could appear more frequently in non-occidental countries might be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The results of the present systematic review highlight the need of including training in zoonotic diseases since the first years of Veterinary Science degrees, especially focusing on biosecurity measures (hygienic measures and the utilization of the personal protective equipment), as a way of protecting students, and on monitoring programs, so as to adequately advise affected students or students suspicious of enduring zoonoses.

Indexed as

Education, VeterinaryAnimalsHumansPublicationsStudentsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID28052113
PMCPMC5215727
OpenAlexW2570823788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.