SynthesisPloS one2017
Zoonoses in Veterinary Students: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A retrospective epidemiological analysis of human Cryptosporidium infection in China during the past three decades (1987-2018).PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Fostering learning among the next generation of veterinarians: incorporating one health and antimicrobial stewardship into veterinary medicine training curricula in Ethiopia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Zoonotic infections in UK and Irish veterinary students: a cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Molecular identification and subtyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in laboratory mice and rats.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2024Article
- ControllingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Exploring veterinary students' awareness and perception of zoonoses risks, infection control practices, and biosecurity measures in Ethiopia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Is there a higher risk of exposure toOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Evaluation Survey on Agreement with Existing Definitions of Biosecurity with a Focus on Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Veterinarians as a Risk Group for Zoonoses: Exposure, Knowledge and Protective Practices in Finland.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- Veterinary Students Have a Higher Risk of Contracting Cryptosporidiosis when Calves with High FecalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- A Review on the Prevalence ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Determinants of Work-Related Risks among Veterinary Clinical Students in South West Nigeria.Veterinary medicine international · 2020Article
- [Zoonoses and occupational health in the veterinary profession].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVeterinary students face diverse potential sources of zoonotic pathogens since the first years of their academic degree. Such sources include different animal species and pathologic materials which are used at university facilities as well as commercial clinics, farms and other external facilities.
objectivesThe present study utilizes a systematic review of the literature to identify zoonoses described in veterinary students. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science and PubMed.
resultsOf the 1,254 titles produced by the bibliographic search, 62 were included in this review. Whereas 28 of these articles (45.2%) described individual cases or outbreaks, the remaining 34 (54.8%) reported serological results. The zoonotic etiological agents described were bacteria, in 39 studies (62.9%), parasites, in 12 works (19.4%), virus, in 9 studies (14.5%) and fungi, in 2 (3.2%) of the selected articles. The selected literature included references from 24 different countries and covered the time period of the last 55 years. LIMITATIONS: The fact that common cases of disease or cases of little clinical importance without collective repercussions are not usually published in peer-reviewed journals limits the possibility to reach conclusions from a quantitative point of view. Furthermore, most of the selected works (66.1%) refer to European or North American countries, and thus, the number of cases due to pathogens which could appear more frequently in non-occidental countries might be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The results of the present systematic review highlight the need of including training in zoonotic diseases since the first years of Veterinary Science degrees, especially focusing on biosecurity measures (hygienic measures and the utilization of the personal protective equipment), as a way of protecting students, and on monitoring programs, so as to adequately advise affected students or students suspicious of enduring zoonoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.