ArticlePloS one2017
Insertional Mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Gene Editing in Cells Targeted for Point Mutation Repair Directed by Short Single-Stranded DNA Oligonucleotides.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-directed exon skipping; friend or foe (opportunity or warning sign)?Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Mutation Breeding ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Restored glyoxylate metabolism after AGXT gene correction and direct reprogramming of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 fibroblasts.iScience · 2024Article
- Review
- Exon skipping induced by CRISPR-directed gene editing regulates the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells.Gene therapy · 2022Article
- Homology directed correction, a new pathway model for point mutation repair catalyzed by CRISPR-Cas.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.Molecular cell · 2022Review
- mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease.Nature communications · 2021Article
- A Consensus Model of Homology-Directed Repair Initiated by CRISPR/Cas Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Deconvolution of Complex DNA Repair (DECODR): Establishing a Novel Deconvolution Algorithm for Comprehensive Analysis of CRISPR-Edited Sanger Sequencing Data.The CRISPR journal · 2021Article
- Article
- gRNA Sequence Heterology Tolerance Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas in an In Vitro Homology-Directed Repair Reaction.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Kinetics of Nuclear Uptake and Site-Specific DNA Cleavage during CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing in Solid Tumor Cells.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2020Article
- Cas9 Mediated Correction ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
- CRISPR-based strategies for targeted transgene knock-in and gene correction.Faculty reviews · 2020Review
- Engineered materials for in vivo delivery of genome-editing machinery.Nature reviews. Materials · 2019Article
- Programmable Molecular Scissors: Applications of a New Tool for Genome Editing in Biotech.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Review
- Understanding the diversity of genetic outcomes from CRISPR-Cas generated homology-directed repair.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Gene surgery: Potential applications for human diseases.EXCLI journal · 2019Review
- Functional Gene Knockout ofMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 and single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs) have been used to direct the repair of a single base mutation in human genes. Here, we examine a method designed to increase the precision of RNA guided genome editing in human cells by utilizing a CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex to initiate DNA cleavage. The RNP is assembled in vitro and induces a double stranded break at a specific site surrounding the mutant base designated for correction by the ssODN. We use an integrated mutant eGFP gene, bearing a single base change rendering the expressed protein nonfunctional, as a single copy target in HCT 116 cells. We observe significant gene correction activity of the mutant base, promoted by the RNP and single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide with validation through genotypic and phenotypic readout. We demonstrate that all individual components must be present to obtain successful gene editing. Importantly, we examine the genotype of individually sorted corrected and uncorrected clonally expanded cell populations for the mutagenic footprint left by the action of these gene editing tools. While the DNA sequence of the corrected population is exact with no adjacent sequence modification, the uncorrected population exhibits heterogeneous mutagenicity with a wide variety of deletions and insertions surrounding the target site. We designate this type of DNA aberration as on-site mutagenicity. Analyses of two clonal populations bearing specific DNA insertions surrounding the target site, indicate that point mutation repair has occurred at the level of the gene. The phenotype, however, is not rescued because a section of the single-stranded oligonucleotide has been inserted altering the reading frame and generating truncated proteins. These data illustrate the importance of analysing mutagenicity in uncorrected cells. Our results also form the basis of a simple model for point mutation repair directed by a short single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.