Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28052012›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

The biological properties of different Epstein-Barr virus strains explain their association with various types of cancers.

Ming-Han Tsai, Xiaochen Lin, Anatoliy Shumilov, Katharina Bernhardt, Regina Feederle, Remy Poirey, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Bruno Pereira, Raquel Almeida, Henri-Jacques Delecluse

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. EBV Genome Variations and Association With Diseases.Journal of medical virology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Han TsaiGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Xiaochen LinGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anatoliy ShumilovGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina BernhardtGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Regina FeederleGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Remy PoireyGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Annette Kopp-SchneiderGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit C060, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Bruno PereiraDifferentiation and Cancer Group, IPATIMUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias s/n, 4200 - 465 Porto, Portugal.
Raquel AlmeidaDifferentiation and Cancer Group, IPATIMUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias s/n, 4200 - 465 Porto, Portugal.
Henri-Jacques DelecluseGerman Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEDKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is etiologically associated with the development of multiple types of tumors, but it is unclear whether this diversity is due to infection with different EBV strains. We report a comparative characterization of SNU719, GP202, and YCCEL1, three EBV strains that were isolated from gastric carcinomas, M81, a virus isolated in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma and several well-characterized laboratory type A strains. We found that B95-8, Akata and GP202 induced cell growth more efficiently than YCCEL1, SNU719 and M81 and this correlated positively with the expression levels of the viral BHRF1 miRNAs. In infected B cells, all strains except Akata and B95-8 induced lytic replication, a risk factor for carcinoma development, although less efficiently than M81. The panel of viruses induced tumors in immunocompromised mice with variable speed and efficacy that did not strictly mirror their in vitro characteristics, suggesting that additional parameters play an important role. We found that YCCEL1 and M81 infected primary epithelial cells, gastric carcinoma cells and gastric spheroids more efficiently than Akata or B95-8. Reciprocally, Akata and B95-8 had a stronger tropism for B cells than YCCEL1 or M81. These data suggest that different EBV strains will induce the development of lymphoid tumors with variable efficacy in immunocompromised patients and that there is a parallel between the cell tropism of the viral strains and the lineage of the tumors they induce. Thus, EBV strains can be endowed with properties that will influence their transforming abilities and the type of tumor they induce.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, ViralAnimalsB-LymphocytesCaco-2 CellsCarcinomaCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesEpithelial CellsEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHEK293 CellsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMice, SCIDMicroRNAsNasopharyngeal CarcinomaBHRF1 protein, Human herpesvirus 4MicroRNAsRNA, ViralViral Proteinscarcinoma and lymphomaEpstein-Barr virus strainshost-virus interactionshuman tumor virusesviral infection and transformation

Identifiers

PMID28052012
PMCPMC5354655
OpenAlexW2564616909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.