ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2016
Characterizing Teamwork in Cardiovascular Care Outcomes: A Network Analytics Approach.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden Structure of Care Coordination in Heart Failure Care Transitions: A Mixed-Method Network Analysis of Clinical Notes.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- Article
- A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2025Article
- Impact of COVID-19 visitation policies and hospital capacity on discharge readiness in medicine patients.Discover health systems · 2023Article
- Characterizing intensive care unit rounding teams using meta-data from the electronic health record.Journal of critical care · 2022Article
- An Early Warning Risk and Control Model for Manpower Capital Investment Using Data Warehousing and Computational Intelligence.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Investigation of patient-sharing networks using a Bayesian network model selection approach for congruence class models.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- The Effect of Interdependences of Referral Behaviors on the Quality of Ambulatory Care: Evidence from Taiwan.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Relation of the Networks Formed by Diabetic Patients Sharing Physicians With Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations.Medical care · 2020Article
- A Network Approach to Stroke Systems of Care.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Review
- Healthcare network analysis of patients with diabetes and their physicians.The American journal of managed care · 2019Article
- Article
- A scoping review of patient-sharing network studies using administrative data.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Article
- The Promise of Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe nature of teamwork in healthcare is complex and interdisciplinary, and provider collaboration based on shared patient encounters is crucial to its success. Characterizing the intensity of working relationships with risk-adjusted patient outcomes supplies insight into provider interactions in a hospital environment. METHODS AND
resultsWe extracted 4 years of patient, provider, and activity data for encounters in an inpatient cardiology unit from Northwestern Medicine's Enterprise Data Warehouse. We then created a provider-patient network to identify healthcare providers who jointly participated in patient encounters and calculated satisfaction rates for provider-provider pairs. We demonstrated the application of a novel parameter, the shared positive outcome ratio, a measure that assesses the strength of a patient-sharing relationship between 2 providers based on risk-adjusted encounter outcomes. We compared an observed collaboration network of 334 providers and 3453 relationships to 1000 networks with shared positive outcome ratio scores based on randomized outcomes and found 188 collaborative relationships between pairs of providers that showed significantly higher than expected patient satisfaction ratings. A group of 22 providers performed exceptionally in terms of patient satisfaction. Our results indicate high variability in collaboration scores across the network and highlight our ability to identify relationships with both higher and lower than expected scores across a set of shared patient encounters.
conclusionsSatisfaction rates seem to vary across different teams of providers. Team collaboration can be quantified using a composite measure of collaboration across provider pairs. Tracking provider pair outcomes over a sufficient set of shared encounters may inform quality improvement strategies such as optimizing team staffing, identifying characteristics and practices of high-performing teams, developing evidence-based team guidelines, and redesigning inpatient care processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.