Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28051122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

KRAS-mutation incidence and prognostic value are metastatic site-specific in lung adenocarcinoma: poor prognosis in patients with KRAS mutation and bone metastasis.

Zoltan Lohinai, Thomas Klikovits, Judit Moldvay, Gyula Ostoros, Erzsebet Raso, Jozsef Timar, Katalin Fabian, Ilona Kovalszky, István Kenessey, Clemens Aigner and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03951233 (Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03951233 completednot on this map

Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: Incidence, Significance and Treatment Implications

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2000 to 2014Enrolled424ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GenotypingCancer genomics & proteomics
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zoltan LohinaiNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Thomas KlikovitsDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Judit MoldvayNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Gyula OstorosNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Erzsebet Raso2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Jozsef Timar2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin FabianDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ilona Kovalszky1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
István Kenessey2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Clemens AignerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Ferenc Renyi-VamosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Walter KlepetkoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Balazs DomeNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Balazs HegedusDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines lack comprehensive information on the metastatic site-specific role of KRAS mutation in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). We investigated the effect of KRAS mutation on overall survival (OS) in this setting. In our retrospective study, 500 consecutive Caucasian metastatic LADC patients with known KRAS mutational status were analyzed after excluding 32 patients with EGFR mutations. KRAS mutation incidence was 28.6%. The most frequent metastatic sites were lung (45.6%), bone (26.2%), adrenal gland (17.4%), brain (16.8%), pleura (15.6%) and liver (11%). Patients with intrapulmonary metastasis had significantly increased KRAS mutation frequency compared to those with extrapulmonary metastases (35% vs 26.5%, p = 0.0125). In contrast, pleural dissemination and liver involvement were associated with significantly decreased KRAS mutation incidence (vs all other metastatic sites; 17% (p < 0.001) and 16% (p = 0.02) vs 33%, respectively). Strikingly, we found a significant prognostic effect of KRAS status only in the bone metastatic subcohort (KRAS-wild-type vs KRAS-mutant; median OS 9.7 v 3.7 months; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.79; p  = 0.003). Our study suggests that KRAS mutation frequency in LADC patients shows a metastatic site dependent variation and, moreover, that the presence of KRAS mutation is associated with significantly worse outcome in bone metastatic cases.

Identifiers

PMID28051122
PMCPMC5209707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.